IT WAS shortly after one o'clock in the morning on Friday, May 25,
that the question of whether Dr David Owen's SDP could survive moved up
a few notches on the scale of issues of political interest.
The party's candidate in the Bootle by-election, Mr Jack Holmes, had
just come seventh out of the eight candidates, polling precisely 155
votes and trailing 263 votes behind Lord David Sutch's Raving Loony
Party.
The entire Bootle campaign had a beleaguered air about it and it was
difficult not to feel that the stuffing had been knocked out of the
party.
A couple of days before the by-election, Dr Owen and Mr Holmes held a
press conference in the lounge bar of a dingy local pub, with a few
small SDP posters, stuck to a board with drawing pins, forming the
backdrop for the cameras.
A small group of half-interested journalists listened to the doctor
pronounce yet again on the need for proportional representation and for
deals and pacts with other parties. He talked of his own future -- ''I
have to decide whether I wish to take part in this insanity'' -- and the
next day was musing once more about whether he should quit.
When the Bootle result came it was a sad humiliation which seemed a
million miles away from the heady days of 1981 when the Gang of Four --
David Owen, Roy Jenkins, Bill Rodgers and Shirley Williams -- formed the
party which was going to break the mould and change the face of British
politics. A million miles, too, from the stunning by-election victories
at Crosby, Hillhead and Greenwich.
The beginning of the end for the SDP can probably be traced back to
the party conference season of 1986 when the Liberals, meeting in
Eastbourne, dealt a severe blow to the Alliance formed between the two
parties by steadfastly refusing to abandon a non-nuclear defence policy.
The then Liberal leader, Mr David Steel, flew to London for a crisis
meeting with Dr Owen, and while they were eventually able to cobble
together a form of words which took them through the 1987 election, the
relationship between the two men, and the two parties, was never quite
the same again.
The election brought its own problems, with Owen and Steel being
ridiculed as Tweedledum and Tweedledee because of their less than
impressive joint television appearances, and a result for the Alliance
which fell well short of their hopes and expectations.
A few days after the election, David Steel proposed a full merger of
the two parties, provoking a bitter squabble within the SDP between Owen
and his supporters, who wanted to carry on as an independent force, and
the majority of the party who backed the merger.
Matters really came to a head at the 1987 SDP conference in
Portsmouth, with Owen making an impassioned plea to the party to keep
its nerve, but finding himself all but ignored by the membership as they
moved towards the creation of the Social and Liberal Democrats. Owen
says he wept in his hotel room.
The man would probably concede himself that his greatest failing is
his unwillingness to compromise, and it was in evidence yet again when
he decided he wanted nothing to do with merger and would carry on
leading his small band of the faithful, which included MPs John
Cartwright and Rosie Barnes.
From then on, however, it was downhill all the way, with Paddy
Ashdown's Liberal Democrats determined to smash the Owenites and firmly
establish themselves in the centre ground. The SDP, with dwindling
membership and kept afloat only by the generosity of David Sainsbury,
found itself being pushed more and more to the sidelines and being
looked upon as an irrelevance. Bootle provided the last straw.
It is sad that Mr Cartwright and Mrs Barnes will almost certainly end
up as casualties of what has turned out to be an unhappy political
adventure. Mrs Barnes is tougher than she looks and has built up a good
reputation as a constituency MP. Mr Cartwright, arguably more than Dr
Owen, embodies what the SDP stands for.
As for the doctor himself, he may soldier on as an MP or he may decide
to give up politics altogether and turn his considerable talents to
something else. His present position is hardly the pinnacle of the
glittering political career which was predicted by some for the man who
was Foreign Secretary at the age of 39.
In the book Personally Speaking, in which Owen was interviewed at
length about his life and beliefs by Mr Kenneth Harris, he gives a
defiant insight into what makes him tick.
He says: ''At heart we are a thoughtful nation, a nation that will
respond to thoughtful leadership. Eventually Britain will both prosper
and be united again. I believe this will happen under a coalition
government which introduces proportional representation as a way of
deepening our democracy and preventing us from debilitating ourselves on
an ideological seesaw.
''For my part, I was a Social Democrat when I joined the party Hugh
Gaitskell led in 1959, I was a Social Democrat when I helped found the
SDP in 1981 and I intend to remain a Social Democrat.''
In his heart he probably will, but as former SDP MP, now Liberal
Democrat, Mr Charles Kennedy said last week: ''The game is up, the
party's over.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article