THEORIES on the exact date of Christ's death have been debated for centuries, but now two astronomers claim to have pinpointed it to the exact hour.
Liviu Mircea and Tiberiu Oproiu from the Astronomic Observatory Institute in Cluj, Romania, said yesterday that research carried out using a computer programme checked against biblical references showed Christ died at 3pm on Friday, April 3, 33 AD, and rose again on Sunday, April 5, at 4am.
The starting point for their calculations was the New Testament record that Jesus died on the day after the first night with a full moon following the vernal equinox.
Using data gathered on the stars between 26AD and 35AD they established that in those nine years, the first full moon after the vernal equinox was registered twice: Friday April 7, 30AD and April 3, 33AD.
The astronomers said they had been convinced that the date of the crucifixion had been 33AD and not 30AD, because records showed a solar eclipse, as depicted in the Bible at the time of Jesus' crucifixion, occurred in Jerusalem that year.
While experts do not doubt Jesus's existence, almost everything known about him comes from the New Testament. The Bible does not date precisely when he was born or died.
Since he was certainly born before the death of Herod the Great, much has been made of historian Josephus's statement that Herod died shortly after an eclipse of the moon visible from Jericho.
Most chronologists, following the lead of Johann Kepler, the German astronomer, have assumed that the eclipse was that of March 13, in 4 BC. Kepler suggested in 1605 that the Star of Bethlehem, or the ''Christmas Star'', was a conjunction, or close approach, of Saturn, Jupiter and Mars.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article