EDUCATION bosses have apologised to the Chinese community after racist slurs were found in a secondary school exam paper.
The Scottish Qualifications Authority has sent out apologies to racial equality campaigners following a stream of complaints for the use of the phrases Chinky and Who Flung Dung in an interpretation passage in this year's Standard Grade English paper.
Large sections of the Chinese community were left deeply offended at the content of the paper, which was sat by children across Scotland.
Signed by SQA awards division director David Elliot, the letters accept that the complaints were ''fully justified''. Representatives of the Chinese community have expressed relief at the apology, but believe it must be followed up with letters to schools around the country to make sure the piece has not had a damaging effect on racial harmony within schools.
Edward Tsang, secretary of the Confederation of Chinese Associations of Scotland, said: ''We are glad that the SQA has responded with an apology to Chinese people from all over Scotland.
''This has been an upsetting issue - we even heard a story about a disabled Chinese boy in Ayr who had to have the piece read out loud to him, he was very upset. I can understand that the story is trying to show racist behaviour in a certain light but the extract was used in entirely the wrong environment in this case. The whole episode has caused a lot of upset but now we are in the process of writing to head teachers across Scotland to make sure there is not a knock-on effect."
The tale is about an encounter between a group of drunk Scots and a young Asian couple at a bus station. The Scots harass the Asian couple saying, ''Fancy a chinky, eh? Deid cat chop suey. Hey - Who Flung Dung!''
The written apology from the authority states: ''SQA is committed to the principles of equal opportunities and as part of this policy we issue a checklist designed to avoid cultural, racial or religious bias in examination tasks.
''While I understand that the setters selected the passage with the aim of stimulating the interest of young people, it was an error of judgement for which SQA must accept responsibility. We apologise unreservedly for the distress caused to candidates. In order to ensure that it does not happen again, we have sought the advice of the Commission for Racial Equality on how our guidance to setters might be improved."
Although the short story on which the interpretation piece was based has an anti-racist message, it was felt by the Chinese Associations of Scotland that in the context of the exam the excerpt came across as misrepresentative of Oriental people in this country.
The short story, titled Barely an Incident and taken from the book Red Tides, was written by Glasgow-born fiction writer and poet Dilys Rose, a former winner of the Macallan short story prize.
She spoke yesterday about her concern at causing any part of the Chinese community, saying: ''The point of the story is actually to show racism up for what it is - stupid. I am really sorry that I have offended anybody in the Chinese community, that was never my intention, I just feel if you're going to deal with an issue like racism you can't do it politely. I dealt with it in a way that I found appropriate, perhaps different cultures would deal with the problem in a different way.''
Tayside Racial Equality Council (TREC) chairman Dudley Kay, said he was pleased to receive the written apology but stressed: ''We would like to have a representative on the education committee so that we can solve any problems before they are allowed to go this far.
''We received a complaint from representatives of the local Chinese community, who were deeply offended at the content of this national exam paper. As we work for all the community, we took immediate action.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article