TWO leading figures in the Scottish Green Party, one a candidate in the Scottish Parliament elections, were arrested yesterday when trouble flared at one of the largest protests in Scotland against genetically-modified crops.
Four other people were also detained in scuffles with police officers as some of the 100 or so demonstrators, demanding an end to GM crop trial sites, spilled over fencing and invaded a Midlothian field.
Extensive damage was caused to the field, a test site of the Scottish Agricultural College at Boghall Farm on the outskirts of Edinburgh.
Demonstrators tore at the earth as they staged a sit-in and police officers, some with dogs, moved in as the trouble began shortly after a cardboard ''coffin'' was thrown into the field.
Several clashes erupted in what had initially been a good-natured show of opposition by the pressure group, Earth First.
One man had to be carried, handcuffed, by four officers to a police van.
Lothian and Borders police, which at the height of the trouble had around 30 officers at the scene including reinforcements, said later six protesters had been arrested.
The six, four men and two women, are expected to face charges including vandalism and breach of the peace.
Scottish Green Party candidate Mark Ballard, on the Lothian list for the May election, said later he had been arrested for pulling up genetically modified oil seed rape. He claimed that if the Government refused to protect people and the countryside his party had to take ''peaceful direct action''.
Mr James Mackenzie, the party's education spokesman, said after his arrest that to test how dangerous genetically modified crops were by releasing them into the environment was ''irresponsible in the extreme''.
Yesterday's ''Stop the Crop'', protest which began with a march from a nearby organic farm, is the latest in a series of demonstrations on the issue of the so-called ''Frankenstein foods''.
It came exactly a year after 60 activists from Fife Earth First attacked a crop of genetic oilseed rape growing in Fife.
The protest also took place on the eve of a court trial in Plymouth where two women face charges in connection with an incident where #60,000 of damage was caused at a controversial test site of GM maize in Devon.
On Saturday in the south, activists from the group Genetix Snowball stole 100 items of GM food to ''decontaminate'' a Tesco supermarket in London and carried out similar action at a Manchester Safeway store.
The amount of damage caused yesterday in Midlothian is not yet known. Protest organisers said ''genetic pollution'' would not be tolerated. They claimed the health risks were unknown yet the politicians and regulatory systems were failing to protect the interests of the public.
Mr David Cranstoun, a specialist with the Scottish Agricultural College, said there was one trial site at Boghall on genetically modified winter oilseed rape while another dealing with spring oilseed rape was planned shortly.
He stressed the trials, part of the UK variety testing system, were not carried out ''for Monsanto or for any other potential seller of GM material''.
Mr Cranstoun added that, as a result of the trials, the authorities would decide whether crop varieties - both conventional and genetically-modified - would be marketed in the UK.
The SAC believed the way to overcome the confusion and anxiety over the materials was to carry out controlled trials.
''There are those who wish to destroy the trials here,'' Mr Cranstoun said. ''If they succeed, there will be less evidence available on which good objective decisions can be taken in the future.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article