WE, the undersigned rank-and-file trade-union members, are publicly asking our union leaders why they have been so silent on the issue of adequate funding for public services. Despite the fact that their members' jobs depend on adequate funding for public services, our union leadership have been strangely silent over the past few weeks while the debate has been raging.
New Labour have declared that a tax cut is possible because they say public services are adequately funded and have joined forces with the CBI in promoting this view while criticising the SNP's policy of rejecting the tax cut and investing these resources in education, health, and housing. Who do our union leaders agree with?
Up to now our union leaders have said nothing. Could this be because Tony Blair phoned many of them personally requesting their silence on the issue? We demand to know where our union leaders, whose wages we pay to represent us, stand on the funding of public services and whether they take their orders from their members or from Tony Blair.
Shona Robison, Unison (Glasgow); Kirsten Hey, Unison (Edinburgh Royal Infirmary); Marion Davis, ACTS (Glasgow); William Douglas, MSF (retired members); Susan Forde , EIS (East Lothian); Douglas McBride, BIFU (Edinburgh); Neil McDonagh, CWU (Glasgow); Maureen McDonagh, CWU (Glasgow); Rhona MacDonald, PCS (DSS Clydeside); Rowland Sheret, ACTS (Bridge of Allan); Brian Smith, AWU (Rosyth); Dale Smith, EIS (Angus); Linda Fabiani, ACTS (East Kilbride); Stewart Hosie, MSF (Glasgow); Anne McNair, Unison (Glasgow); Bill Ramsay, EIS (Lanarkshire); Alan Petrie, AWU (Dundee); Andy Dawson, ACTS (Dundee); Alan MacDonald, Unison (Glasgow). March 23.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article