THE son of millionairess Vera Weisfield appeared before a sheriff yesterday after failing to pay #750 aliment to his estranged second wife.
Agents representing Mrs Anita McDonald - who had asked the court to consider civil imprisonment over the arrears - urged Sheriff David Pender to hold Mr John McDonald, from Templetonburn, near Kilmarnock in Ayrshire, in contempt over the debt.
Mr McDonald had claimed during a previous hearing that the debt had already been cleared.
However, when the case was recalled yesterday to allow Mr McDonald to provide proof that the aliment had been paid, his counsel conceded that the court had previously been misled and the #750 debt still existed.
The court was told that #65 per week should have been paid to Mrs McDonald in accordance with a decree granted last November. The total sum owed covered the period to February this year - plus expenses.
Mr McDonald claimed he had not set out to deliberately mislead the court, and genuinely believed that he had sent a cheque to cover the arrears.
In addition, it was discovered that court papers showed Mr McDonald paid #100 a month in a separate settlement to his former wife from his failed first marriage.
At an earlier hearing, Mr McDonald had told a different sheriff that he paid #200 a month. His counsel explained Mr McDonald had voluntarily increased the aliment although there was no formal agreement.
In the circumstances, McDonald gave an undertaking to pay his second wife, Anita, of Espedair Street in Paisley, #85 per week.
Counsel stressed that Mr McDonald had not intended to display wilful disobedience to the court.
Sheriff Pender said: ``In the circumstances, I accept the explanation and will take this matter no further.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article