INCREASING numbers of new graduates feel they are stuck in dead-end jobs, according to a survey.
More than half consider themselves under employed and one in 10 know they are in jobs which have not previously required a degree.
The findings, by the Institute for Employment Studies, reflect a massive expansion of higher education - which now includes one in three school leavers.
The survey is based on a study of students who graduated from the University of Sussex between 1991 and 1993.
It shows that, in the long term, getting a degree still pays off in employment prospects.
More than half the graduates were in permanent jobs 18 months after leaving university and nearly three quarters after three years.
However, one in three graduates had been through stages of temporary employment and, three years after leaving university, half were earning less than #14,000.
One in 10 were working in clerical and secretarial jobs which would not previously have required a degree.
More than half considered themselves to be under-employed - principally in the lack of ``intellectual challenge'' in their jobs.
Career dissatisfaction was higher with more recent graduates, who were more likely to feel frustrated at the use being made of their skills and the career opportunities available. Researcher Helen Connor said: ``The study confirms that the graduate market is becoming more polarised in terms of career prospects.
``Larger numbers of graduates are having to settle, at least initially, for lower-skilled and often temporary employment.''
``Under-employment is likely to remain in the foreseeable future unless more employers recognise the benefits from increased output from higher education.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article