UEFA, European football's governing body, last night scrapped restrictions on foreign players appearing in their club competitions.
They announced their decision - it comes two months after the Jean-Marc Bosman judgment - after seven hours of talks at a London hotel.
But UEFA president Lennart Johansson is confident that survivors in this season's Champions' League, Cup-winners' Cup, and UEFA Cup will stick by their voluntary agreement to retain selection limits for the rest of the current campaign.
How that will be viewed by the European Commission remains to be seen, but Scotland's David Will, handed the responsibility by Johansson of announcing the rule change, stressed: ``UEFA have no intention to do anything but act within the law.''
Will said that there would be discussions later this week with FIFPRO - the European players union - to find some common ground for an alternative structure which would have domestic interests at heart and also satisfy the commission.
UEFA officials had met representatives of all clubs still involved in their three competitions at a meeting in Geneva last week - and it was views expressed there which led to their belated action.
Will said: ``You all know that last week in Geneva the remaining clubs in the UEFA competitions declared voluntarily that it was their intention not to change the rules halfway through.
``They expressed that view as a spirit of sportsmanship and fair play and it was not following pressure by UEFA.
``The executive committee recognise - as we had already recognised at the time of the judgment - that the nationality rule (the so-called three-plus-two rule) can no longer be applied at the level of domestic competitions within national associations.
``In light of these two factors the committee concluded that the rule was effectively obsolete and took the decision that it be lifted with immediate effect in European club competitions.
``That being said, we have problems for the future because the three-plus-two and transfer rules were there for the benefit of football and we have somehow to observe completely new concepts within the law.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article