ONE of the most outrageous blunders in athletics history has negated
the finest hour of Scottish marathon runner Trudi Thomson. The
organisers of the World championships admited yesterday that the course
was 400 metres short.
Thomson, Pitreavie's world ultra silver medallist, who sliced 62
seconds from her lifetime best to finish as the leading Briton, was
devastated to learn that this performance, which would have launched her
into the national all-time top-10, will never be recognised.
All three medallists, but only five athletes in all, ran best-ever
times. The winner, European champion Manuela Machado (2hr 25min 39sec)
took more than two minutes from her best, while runner-up Anuta Catuna
(2-26-25), with whom she had staged an hour-long battle, set a Romanian
national record which will not be ratified.
Athletes who believed they had achieved the Olympic qualifying
standard will now have to race again.
A disgusted Machado said: ''If they want me to go and do the extra 400
metres now, I'll do it.''
She was surprised at her time in that heat and asked, on crossing the
line, if she should run a further lap. Many athletes were confused by
the instructions, and Thomson also attempted to run an extra lap.
''I deeply regret this unfortunate mistake, which will not affect the
final placings,'' said competitions director Carl-Gustav Tollemar.
''It's my fault, nobody else's . . . I am ashamed.''
Thomson had been delighted with her twenty-second place in 2-41-42.
The shade temperature was 75[DEG], but there was little of that on the
boiling tarmac of a carnival opening Saturday afternoon. Out there on
the road, it was nearly 15[DEG] hotter. Eleven of the 43 starters failed
to finish.
Edinburgh's Alison Rose was in obvious distress, twenty-eighth in
2-45-52, with tears the last moisture to be surrendered by her
dehydrated body as she finished three minutes outside her best.
With the race, held mid-afternoon in defiance of competitors' wishes,
producing incompetence of such magnitude, gob-smacked pundits would have
been unsurprised had Tollemar announced a re-run this morning.
Thomson rightly views this debut UK marathon run as a triumph. ''I'm
disappointed at losing my personal best, but I'm still pleased with my
performance,'' she said.
After the birth of her third daughter six years ago, Thomson weighed
13.5 stones, suffering from the condition, bulimia. Now she barely
weighs eight stones.
''Yet I still suffer,'' she revealed. ''It will never leave me. When I
look in the mirror, I see a different person from everyone else. I still
think I am fat.
''I can't believe what I have achieved. Just standing on that
start-line was a triumph for me. I wondered what I was doing with all
these stars. I'm used to much longer distances. It was a bit of a sprint
for me.''
The eve of the race was the fortieth birthday of her husband, Ian. ''I
saw him for just 45 minutes. Enough time to hand him the children's
birthday cards, and a wee slice of birthday cake.''
Machado finished blowing kisses to the crowd. The difference in the
shortened course, worth around 90 seconds, means she would still have
set a personal record.
The only other title of the opening day, the women's shot, went to
former European champion Astrid Kumbernuss. The 6ft 3in German, almost
double Machado's weight at 14.5 stones, reached 21.22m, the longest
women's shot putt for five years and the biggest championship
title-winning putt since the Seoul Olympics.
Kumbernuss dismissed the inevitable question: ''I have been
dope-tested four or five times this year in competition and eight times
out of competition.''
Britain's Judy Oakes, in her nineteenth international year and on her
seventy-first appearance for Britain, reached 17.87m, missing the final
by just one place.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article