After the fiction writing class at Wormwood Scrubs, the post of
Writing Fellow at the University of East Anglia should have been a
breeze. But for Carole Morin it was a sentence of sentences. Here, she
explains why she ended up wanting to machine-gun the entire populaton of
Norwich.
WHEN I was offered the position of Writing Fellow for the spring
semester at the University of East Anglia this year, I ignored the
warnings of previous fellows and decided not to refuse. So what if one
of them nearly went mental, another ran away, and another considered
jumping into the lake because the rest of the faculty wouldn't say hello
to him? Living on the Norwich campus for four months couldn't be that
bad. There's an all-night Diet Pepsi machine that gives change: and the
students taking my fiction-writing course -- no matter how spotty --
couldn't be as boring as the murderers in my class at Wormwood Scrubs.
Soon after I arrived, a mutilated photograph of me wearing shorts in
Barcelona was pinned to the door of the office I inherited from Malcolm
Bradbury. Unpinning the picture, I chipped my Rouge Noir nail polish. On
the back, an academic nutcase had written: ''I hate you''.
A lot of people hate writers, usually because they want to be one.
Everyone has a book ''in them'' along with their liver and kidneys. I
threw the picture in Malcy's bin, then opened the windows wide to
relieve the air of its dated perfume.
As I was thinking up lots of good reasons why artists become
alcoholics, a smiling student came to my door. ''Are you the writer?''
he asked me.
''No, I've borrowed her office. I'm Carina Carew the prostitute.''
Harry Matthews, the experimentalist, used to pretend to be an insurance
salesman when asked at a party, ''What do you do?'' Anyone daft enough
to admit to being a writer can expect the next sneery question: ''Had
anything published?'' How many chefs have been asked: ''Anyone eaten
your nosh?''
The grinning galoot gave me his trilogy to read anyway, saying: ''You
don't look like a writer.'' Hail Mary for that.
On the other hand, being taken for a student is a serious insult. On
my first day on the concrete campus I was thrown out of the staff caff
and sent to eat dog turd and chips ''with the other students''.
I'd eaten this turd at Harvard a decade ago, and it didn't taste any
better with East Anglian ketchup. Surrounded by John and Yoko lookalikes
heaving big bags full of stolen books and soiled underwear, who pay 50p
to hear UB40 (?!) on the juke-box, studentworld hadn't changed. There's
even a blonde who looks identical to a girl who used to be in my drama
class. Alarmingly, it turns out to be the same girl -- she must be a
woman now -- still studying after all these years.
In the corridor outside my office, men with backcombed grey hair and
women with faces like boiled eggs rabbited off in the opposite direction
to avoid me. I refused to take it personally. This rabbit run is the
normal procedure among socially autistic academics. A high proportion of
them are students who didn't have another idea. Thirty years on this
campus (that used to be a golf course) would give anyone personality
problems.
The inmates in an institution are never quite as bad as the staff;
though writing courses are famous for attracting loonies. One of my
poet-murderers in the Scrubs had invited me to move into his cell ''on a
trial basis''.
Superficially, UEA resembles the prison: the students are treated like
shit and the central heating is never switched off.
While in-residence at Glasgow University, Alasdair Gray said: ''It's
always the weirdos who visit you.'' There's the traditional dandruffy
plastic-carrier-clutching student with Ideas who doesn't do Sentences;
then argues that it's part of his Style. There's the jolly out-there
foreign student who wants to know how to Structure their issues. There's
the great galoot with stunning A-level results and a memory like a
tape-recorder who can repeat back what you've just said but doesn't do
spontaneous dialogue.
These visits had a rigid etiquette. The story appeared in my mailbox.
The scribbler knocked on my door and asked: ''Have I got it?'' There are
those who're only going to believe a bad talent forecast; and others who
expect to be complimented for their genius. Like Mystic Meg, I took an
ambiguous guess -- hoping there would be no tears or violence -- but
keeping a hammer handy, just in case.
The interview concluded with an insult. ''So,'' the student said to
me, ''you're a writer? Well I haven't heard of you!'' (I'll take it as a
compliment.) Or, ''I bought your book but I couldn't be bothered reading
it''. (Tee-hee, I still get the royalties.) Or, ''I could write a book
exactly like yours if I felt like it''. (I could never write like you.)
A summons to a creative-writing debate arrived. I was supposed to pay
to listen to a group of people who'd taught writing answer the loaded
question, ''Can Creative Writing Be Taught?''
Evidently. Malcolm Bradbury for one has made a career out of it. But
can it be taught effectively? Imagination is anarchic. The academic
instructor expects to stick to a course outline. This certainty of a
neat set of rules appeals to students whose brains are already
programmed to analyse, not imagine. But rules can make fiction
flawlessly unambitious. A random flick through the work of old boy and
girl, Mark Illis and Suzanna Dunn, on the campus bookstore reveals
remarkably similar sentence structures in bland books with transparent
issues. As aptly named Dean Lorna Sage says: ''There's a true
slipperiness in any text worth its salt.''
Students often ask: ''If Bradbury was any good at teaching writing
wouldn't his own books be better?'' Another professor insists that ''the
best thing about his novels is that nobody reads them''. An Italian
intellectual admitted: ''I read one! He has this useful technique of
announcing a joke at least five pages in advance''.
It's impossible to be a mediocre practitioner but a brilliant
motivator. Though it's likely that famous graduates Ian McEwan and Kazuo
Ishiguro would have been published without Professor Bradbury's
guidance. Who knows, their novels may have been more exciting. As
anarchist Enrico Malatesta said: ''If a man was born with chains on his
legs . . . he might attribute his ability to walk to those very
chains.''
Though the question could be ''Why not teach writing?'' It's as
justifiable an option for a degree course as Renaissance poetry or the
semiotics of the big toe.
My class met once a week at 9am in the basement. There was a bad smell
in the room, possibly because students didn't have time to jump into the
communal shower beforehand. They'd been up all night raging -- or
reading -- and need as much sleep as possible before a hard day's
talking.
My students were familiar with UEA creative-writing structure -- or
the Malcolm Method; photocopied fiction from two subscribers is
circulated in advance; read aloud in the two-hour seminar; then
discussed by the group. Everyone falls asleep until it's their turn.
''So,'' I said to introduce myself, ''write a short fiction in the
first person on losing your virginity.''
''Aren't we going to discuss this?'' Dandruff asked, alarmed.
''In this writing class we're going to write,'' I replied, full of my
own importance.
''I'm still a virgin,'' Smiler admitted out loud.
''Make it up.'' I explained the relationship between autobiography and
fiction -- how the first-person voice isn't really you. Seven-year-olds
understand this, but educated teenagers stress about motivation.
''Who is it then?'' Big Bore asked.
''It's your character.''
''How do I know who he is?'' he persisted, with a face that was asking
for a slap.
''Ambiguity can make art more interesting.''
Outside my window, defecating dogs used the gap between the house I
was paid to live in and the lake. None of their owners carried pooper
scoopers. As the semester progressed, the dogs were still defecating --
sometimes taking a swim afterwards. The students had started wearing
crazy tight shorts to show off their thunderthighs. If I were writing
from life, I'd have to use this scene in my book.
Nick Hornby gave a reading from his novel, High Fidelity, and admitted
that it's made up! A student visited me to complain: ''That guy hasn't
done his research. I wasn't impressed.''
''But surely making it up makes it better? Fiction's supposed to be
invented.'' Unconvinced, she handed in a story about incest -- leaving
me to vomit over the anal research.
Stories about incest were pushed under my door until I felt like
committing suicide. Stories about bored teenagers in a borrowed car
driving to an off-licence made me reach for the iced vodka. The
good-natured-mum-who-wants-to iron-lots-of-shirts story gave me violent
fantasies. Though I would hate to have missed the intriguing tale about
the addictive side of airport prostitution; and two boy geniuses in a
class of 11 isn't bad.
Even though I kept urging them to lie and reinvent reality, they kept
assuring me that ''everything I've written is true''. When I suggested
that anyone stuck for inspiration could steal from other art forms, my
Likeable Lad student confessed to taking a tin of salmon from the Union
Stores.
My colleagues were still rabbiting off in the other direction when
they saw me coming, and even occasionally swinging doors in my face --
but I refused to take it personally. The thought of having to talk and
use the photocopier throws the boiled-egg brigade into a panic attack.
Anyway I'd started jumping into the elevator and using the back stairs
to avoid people myself. Not to mention pretending to be my twin sister,
Carina Carew.
Then I heard that the vice-chancellor didn't approve of me. A meeting
had been held in the coffee-room. My worst offence was that when UEA had
its Teaching Quality Assessment the external examiner graded me
(snigger, smirk) Excellent, while the School was Satisfactory. Instead
of making me want to jump in the lake, this open warfare cheered me up.
I could stop pretending it was nothing personal.
Near the end of my sentence, Hugo Williams -- a former Fellow who has
continued to teach poetry at UEA for 15 years -- cheerfully asked: ''Is
everyone being horrible to you?'' Doing their feeble best. Though the
Vice-Chancellor's racy wife had explained that I was joking when I said
I wanted to machine-gun everyone in Norwich. Doors had stopped slamming
in my face and a few people had smiled at me. (OK, they stank of gin.)
Now school's out. I've escaped the Norwich nightmare. Angela Carter
was an extra in my dream last night. Wearing an alarmingly tight PVC
catsuit, she was driving around the UEA campus in a caddie, hunting down
a cockroach that turned out to be Professor Bradbury.
Angela Carter didn't have a big faculty fan club at UEA until after
she became famous. ''That was when Angela really wanted to kill them,
when they tried to take the credit for inventing her.''
* Carole Morin writes Half Life, a weekly column in the Spectator. Her
new book, Dead Glamorous, will be published by Gollancz next spring. Her
novel, Lampshades (described in the Sunday Times as ''Lolita with a
brain''), recently sold out in paperback and is currently on loan from
every library in Central London.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article