On St Andrew's Day 1996, the Stone of Destiny, was installed in Edinburgh Castle. The Stone of Scone, traditional coronation stone of Scottish kings and queens had been stolen by King Edward I 700 years earlier, but throughout that time and still today it remains a powerful symbol of Scottish nationhood.
In a series of ceremonies which saw the stone piped back over the border at Coldstream it was finally placed on display in the castle's crown room. Part of the agreement covering its return is that it should be available for any future coronations.
The stone originates allegedly from the Middle East and was subsequently brought to Scotland, arriving here around 850 AD. Its history is shrouded in myth and stretches back to biblical times when Jacob is said to have used the stone as
a pillow.
The stone was used at Iona, Dunadd, Dunstaffnage, and Scone for enthroning Dalriadic monarchs. In 1292, John Balliol became the last king to use the stone in Scotland.
An unprepossessing block of sandstone - 26in long, 16in wide, 11in high, and weighing 336lb - it sat for centuries in London virtually unguarded.
On Christmas day 1950 the stone was taken from Westminster Abbey by a group of Scottish Nationalist students and subsequently went ''missing''. It was ''found'' about four months later, after being placed in Arbroath Abbey, and was returned to Westminster.
But rumours persist that the stone was never ''missing''. The students who took the stone from Westminster had a replica made, some say more than one. But is the stone now returned to Scotland the real Stone? Did the students of 1951 return only a copy of the stone? Intriguing questions such as these only add to the stone's attraction.
More selections from The Herald's picture archives can be viewed and purchased through our website www.theherald.co.uk, click on the Decades button.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article