A man who served 17 years in prison for the murder of two women out walking their dogs was cleared by the Court of Appeal yesterday.
Peter Fell, 39, freed on bail last December pending the hearing of his fresh appeal, said of his years in jail: ''I have just got to put it behind me and start afresh. If I dwell on it, it will just do me more harm.''
The court will give its reasons at a later date for quashing Mr Fell's convictions of murdering Ann Lee, 44, and Margaret ''Peggy'' Johnson, 65, who were stabbed repeatedly at Aldershot Common, Hampshire, on a May afternoon in 1982.
Jim Nichol, Mr Fell's solicitor, said: ''The real thing about this case is that he is completely and totally innocent. He may be a crackpot, he may be crazy, he may be all these things - and probably was in 1982 - but a murderer he was not and never has been.''
Defence lawyers told the appeal judges that Mr Fell was a victim of ''oppressive'' police interrogation during which he was not allowed access to a solicitor. Psychiatric evidence showed he was vulnerable to suggestion and a ''serial confessor''.
The Crown conceded that his confessions to police were unreliable and that, on that basis alone, his convictions could not be upheld.
The former Bournemouth hospital porter, originally from Accrington, Lancashire, was jailed for life at Winchester Crown Court in August 1984.
Appeal judges Lord Justice Waller, Mr Justice Garland and Mr Justice Sachs heard that Mr Fell was seen five times by police in the months after the murders because he had pointed the finger at himself in a series of telephone calls.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article