What do the Beast of Bolsover, Mr Dennis Skinner MP, and the leader of Sierra Leone, President Kabbah, have in common? They both came urgently to the defence of the beleaguered Foreign Secretary, Mr Robin Cook, yesterday, the former describing him as a master of the brief, the latter offering him support, if not by name then as a member of the British Government which had helped remove the military junta from, and restore democracy to, the West African country. But was British assistance in breach of a UN resolution which states that no weapons or lethal materials were to be supplied to Sierra Leone? Its information minister said the support and materials provided by the British military consultants, Sandline International, before the overthrow of the junta were essentially non-combative, and that weapons were received only after the liberation of the capital, Freetown.
Sandline disputes this version of the scale and timing of its involvement, while insisting famously that the British authorities knew but chose to do nothing about it.
Putting a democratic government back into power in Sierra Leone is a very good thing to have happened but as Mr Cook and the Prime Minister have been saying, knowingly busting UN sanctions is a deadly serious business. It might not matter too much that most of us could not pinpoint Sierra Leone's location on a world map. But it certainly does matter if the British Government knew about and condoned serious breaches of an international embargo, particularly a Government which, despite its willing trade in arms to
Indonesia, still seeks to make a dubious virtue out of some nebulous notion of probity in foreign affairs. We have no reason to doubt Mr Cook when he insists that the first document he received concerning a breach of the embargo was April 28. But such a form of words is open to different interpretations and it certainly does not mesh with yesterday's allegations about papers concerning Sandline's involvement in Sierra Leone being sent to Mr Cook's private office in early March.
The important point is that, like the Tories before them, New Labour Ministers prefer to hide behind verbal ambiguity than endorse crystal clarity. What was it Mr Blair said about learning the lessons of reacting slowly and being evasive in the Bernie Ecclestone affair? What is also important is what it tells us about the process of government: how much information is passed by officials to Ministers, and on what basis? Are harassed Ministers paying it proper attention and making the proper decisions? These are age-old issues yet we seem no nearer knowing an important truth. In the Commons yesterday Mr Cook handled his grilling well, if in a somewhat subdued way. This is not the first crisis in what has been a Foreign Secretaryship marred by a surfeit of diplomatic rows. He could have done with more support from nearer home, but the presence of only one Cabinet Minister on the Government
benches while he defended himself might well have spoken volumes for his political prospects. Meantime, he should learn never to insert the adjective ethical before the phrase foreign policy.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article