Butcher John Barr wanted to be legally approved as a wholesale food producer a year before his cooked meats were blamed as the major source of a deadly food poisoning outbreak.
If his business had been registered, there would have been a system for his products to be clearly labelled and recalled from sale if they posed a health risk.
But the fatal accident inquiry into the deaths of 21 people from E-coli 0157 heard yesterday that, although one environmental health officer told Mr Barr to register, another later gave him a letter exempting him from registration under the Meat Producers (Hygiene) Regulations, 1994.
North Lanarkshire Council environmental health officer Gordon Jorgensen, 37, said that, while working for the former Motherwell District, he told Mr Barr in November 1995 that he should be a registered wholesaler under the regulations.
Mr Jorgensen said Mr Barr was made aware that this would have meant his products had to be labelled and a system of recalling products had to be in place.
Depute fiscal Ian McCann asked: ''Is it within your knowledge that, following a subsequent visit by another officer, Mr Barr was given a letter exempting him from these regulations?'' Mr Jorgensen: ''I believe that is so.''
He said that ''a superior'' of his made the decision to allow Mr Barr to be exempt from registering, because Mr Barr had made no mention that he supplied cold meats to wholesale outlets.
Mr Jorgensen was shown a report compiled after E-coli contaminated products were found in the premises in Caledonian Road, Wishaw, in November 1996. It revealed 40 possible points relating to cross-contamination.
Solicitor Paul Santoni, representing relatives of E-coli victims, asked why such potential risks had not been picked up on previous routine hygiene inspections.
Mr Jorgensen said a normal walk-round hygiene inspection lasted two hours and would be unlikely to throw up as much detail as a two-day investigation.
The inquiry, in Motherwell, continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article