TAYLOR Woodrow has found that it costs about #3000, or around #3 per square foot, more to build a house in Scotland than in most of the UK outside the M25 orbit round London.
That reflects the shortage of skilled labour and higher transport costs for materials including the timber frames.
Timber framed houses account for around 35% of those built in Scotland, but Taylor Woodrow, which sells about 250 units annually in the country, is moving back to the traditional style.
Labour costs have also been pushed up by the improvement in the construction industry, although Taylor Woodrow still believes there are too many players.
Trading has been variable with some sites, such as Molliesburn, selling out very fast, while Kilmarnock has been dull despite the M74 completion making it an ideal dormitory town for those working in Glasgow.
Nevertheless, housebuilding director Paul Phipps said that the June quarter in the central belt had seen a sharp increase in visits and reservations, although that had yet to work its way through to higher prices. These average #77,000 in Scotland - a far cry from the #350,000 the company gets for a two-bedroom flat at City Quay on the Thames, where even the one-bedroom units go for #260,000.
Demand for these has been strong from overseas buyers as well as from City workers.
With both previous and present governments anticipating the building of 4.4 million houses over the next 20 years, chairman Colin Parsons is concerned that the amount of approved land available is well below the implied build of around 200,000 annually.
Only 60% of local authorities have planning policies in place, and he fears there could be a sharp increase in prices demanded for land with full planning consent.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article