There is growing disquiet over the booming assembly line at Scotland's 'Marriage Mecca', discovers Andy Murray
BUT for a combination of geographical accident and parlia-
mentary legislation, Gretna and the adjacent hamlet of Gretna Green would be quiet backwaters. Thanks to their location just north of the border, though, they are still holding their own as the conjugal capital of the UK. Gretna is the ''Marriage Mecca'', where one out of every 10 Scottish civil weddings is conducted
- 252 years after runaway
couples began to head for Scotland following the prohibition of marriages by declaration
in England.
You don't need to be a soothsayer to predict that more
couples will be joined in mat-rimony at the Gretna registration centre this year than last year's 3586. Records tumble annually, and the opening of a #200,000 extension in September bodes well for future totals.
All is not rosy, however, on the path of true romance. Church of Scotland ministers in the presbytery of Annandale and Eskdale are incensed at the growing mercenariness associated with Gretna weddings.
Several companies, four of whom operate from the same set of telephone numbers, offer ''complete packages'' including horse and carriage, piper, kilt hire, cakes, flowers and, of course, a minister thrown in.
A special working group has been set up by the national church administrators to address the issue of how ministers from other parts of Scotland are putting Mammon before their pastoral duties and hiring themselves out to entrepreneurs.
There are claims that some ministers are earning #200 a day for conducting four weddings over the anvil at Gretna Green or in stately homes or castles in the vicinity. Anvil weddings used to be conducted by blacksmiths, joiners, and the like for ''a few bob'' a time. From 1940 they have only been legal if they have been conducted by a minister of religion.
Three years ago eight couples plighted their troth a few yards this side of the Border to the sound of a clergyman hitting a lump of metal with a hammer. Last year around 800 couples were married over the anvil.
The Rev John Miller, who
is the convener of the com-
mittee on social responsibility and public questions for the presbytery of Annandale and Eskdale which includes Gretna, is scathing of colleagues who fatten their wallets by hiring out their services.
''We are not allowed to accept a fee for pastoral services, but
I know that some ministers do, although no minister in this presby-
tery is involved in the conveyor belt style of marriages at Gretna,'' he said.
''I deplore ministers who do this sort of thing in order to shore up their bank balances, quite frankly.
''In my view, ministers who conduct weddings purely from a money point of view, ought to rethink their commitment.
''We are representatives of Christ, and these weddings are becoming almost like an assembly line.''
Mr Miller, who worked as a chaplain at Butlin's for a year, refused to conduct a wedding at the camp between two
people dressed up as cowboys.
''I am not into gimmicks,'' he observed. ''When a minister conducts a wedding he should be involved in the planning and give pastoral guidance before and after to people who are making a lifelong commitment.
''Sadly, these ministers often just appear on the day and ride off into the sunset after doing their quota of weddings. I and many other ministers won't be part of some drama. You get enough of that on television nowadays.'' The Rev Bryan Haston, who is the parish minister at Gretna, refuses to marry couples over the anvil unless they are residents of the parish.
''I think it is very sad that couples come here thinking they are getting the local minister. I don't lose any sleep about it, but I certainly think these weddings should be regularised and taken out of the hands of entre-preneurs,'' he said.
One wedding photographer, who refused to be named, contended that the Church of Scotland was driving couples into taking on arranged packages involving ministers because of their staidness.
''They are Victorian in their attitude,'' he said. ''They ask whether they have been divorced, separated, and another 50 questions.
''The Church is getting it out of context. These people want to be married legally over
the anvil, and they are from Aberdeen, London, Thailand, and British Columbia.''
HE ADDS: ''They want the romance of Gretna Green. As far as fees go, this money is meant to go towards church funds. Some vicars are so straightlaced. They are living in the Victorian era.''
Mike Notman, a former freelance press photographer who has won 17 Kodak awards for his wedding portfolios, disagrees that everything about the Gretna wedding industry is tacky and mercenary.
''The religious ceremonies over the anvil are lovely and couples are full of happiness when they go to Gretna. They are wonderful occasions.
''The happiness they bring far outweighs any kind of local prejudice there may be.''
Antipathy towards anvil weddings among ministers is nothing new, of course. The Rev John Morgan, parish minister in the 1790s, condemned the blacksmiths as ''impostors and priests of their own erection who have no right whatever either to marry or to exercise any part of the clerical function''.
Meanwhile, notwithstanding the imminent opening of an extension at the Gretna registration centre, the civil wedding industry there may be under threat if the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities gets it way. Cosla wants the English status quo adopted whereby civil marriages can be conducted anywhere, even at a stately home or at a football ground.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article