IN his travels through the world of opera-in-concert-performance, Sir Charles Mackerras arrived last night at Lucia De Lammermoor, a splendid choice for the joint celebration of Donizetti's two-hundredth birthday and the Festival's fiftieth.
Though it might have been an occasion for a brilliant new staging such as Graham Vick's at Florence, a powerful study of a woman victimised by indomit-able Scottish masculinity, Sir Charles's revelations were no less compelling. As usual these involved a complete clean-up of the music, resulting in incisive new instrumental tambres, and in bold new distinctions between the heights of Lucia's voice and the depths of the men's - essentially what Vick's production, too, was telling us, but here approached by a different route.
Nobody on hearing it could have doubted that Donizetti's opera is a masterpiece, not just some ramshackle outpouring of Italian bel canto. The tension of Sir Charles's conducting created a constant tightening of the screw, but that was what was built into Donizetti's music anyway, through orchestral writing as finely detailed as Berlioz's - horns, harp, and percussion were all heard to telling effect - and vocal lines invariably at the services of the drama.
But this was also a jolly good performance, pungently colour-ed, strongly paced, with a fierce, dark lustre that seemed exactly right. Andrea Rost's Hungarian Lucia, her mad scene marvellously sustained, is going to be something to look out for in every theatre. Bruce Ford's sweet, yet keenly articulated, Edgardo, Alastair Miles's sonorous Raimondo Bidebent, and Anthony Michaels-Moore's intense Enrico Ashton provided a gallery of male portraits which, even in concert performance, were greatly impressive.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article