THE brother of murdered nurse Yvonne Gilford last night demanded that the two accused nurses in the case stand trial.
''Forget mercy, I want to see her alleged killers in court,'' he said.
Ms Deborah Parry, 42, and Scot Lucille Mc-Lauchlan, 31, are charged with stabbing and beating to death Ms Gilford, 55, an Australian, in her room at King Fahd Hospital in Dhahran last December.
Mr Frank Gilford, 58, stated: ''I don't feel anything for them.''
They were allegedly caught trying to withdraw money with her bank card just hours after the murder. Saudi police claim the pair confessed but they are both now claiming their innocence.
Under Islamic law, they could face the death penalty if convicted unless Ms Gilford's family begs for mercy on their behalf.
A defence lawyer has sent a dossier to Mr Gilford outlining the reasons for him to ask for clemency. However, the appeal has been rejected by Mr Gilford.
''They must face trial. There is an incredible pressure on us to stop this but we are not going to be pushed around by the defence lawyers,'' he said.
''The only way you can base an opinion on anything is with a trial and let the facts speak for themselves. I have faith in the Saudi judicial system to bring out the truth.''
He added: ''We can't even think about asking for mercy until we have heard in court exactly what happened out there.''
Yesterday, the defence lawyers denied they had begged for mercy from the family.
Spokesman Robert Thomas said they had sent ''a rationale for the early waiver of the death penalty, not an appeal for mercy''.
He added: ''It was given to the lawyers of Mr Gilford for the sole purpose of passing it to Mr Gilford for his private reflection.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article