Jim Farry might disagree, but there is no doubt that Celtic and the SFA could not have found a better qualified man than Lord Dervaird to arbitrate in the dispute over the registration of the club's former Portuguese striker, Jorge Cadete.
The only son of a Wigtownshire farmer, John Murray, now 63, was educated at Stranraer High School and Edinburgh Academy before graduating with a first class honours degree from Corpus Christi College, Oxford, in 1959.
He completed his law degree at Edinburgh in 1962 before joining the Scottish Bar, where he carved out an enviable reputation as a heavyweight, particularly in
commercial and agricultural law.
He became a QC in 1974, before a brief spell as a Court of Session and High Court judge between February 1988 and his stunning resignation in December the following year.
His resignation came in the midst of lurid stories about a gay conspiracy in the Scottish legal establishment.
The wilder allegations were laid to rest by the Nimmo Smith/Friel report, which nevertheless made it clear that Lord Dervaird had been guilty of indiscreet behaviour which was incompatible with his continued tenure as a judge.
Lord Dervaird's career seemed in ruins but within a few months he had bounced back as the first ever holder of the Dickson Minto Chair of Company and Commercial Law at Edinburgh University.
He has been a conspicuous success in the post, perhaps more at ease with himself and with the academic challenge than he was as a judge.
He provides opinions on complex areas of commercial law and is one of the country's foremost arbitration experts.
Married with three sons,
Professor Murray's interests
outside the law include farming, gardening, music, ornithology, curling, and field sports.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article