YET another care home bites the dust, requiring 80 elderly people to find alternative accommodation at a time in their lives when they felt they would be looked after properly as long as that was required.
When is this dreadful farce going to be exposed for what it is? This indifferent government of ours knows full well how much it costs to provide care in all its forms but it goes on its merry way regardless of the consequences for a growing number of elderly people who require help, regardless of their relatives, regardless of the thousands of carers who have become their extended families, and regardless of the home-owners themselves, all of whom contribute to our national economy.
How does the Scottish Executive believe standards are going to improve when those who wish to see that they do are starved of funding? Do you know what a senior social worker admitted publicly in a meeting in Inverness two weeks ago? When confronted with the fact that his council charged (pounds) 600 per week for residents seeking a place in a council-run home, his answer was that the council had an obligation to cover its costs. In the same breath he had to admit that the same council paid private residential homes (pounds) 355 per week to provide precisely the same care package. What blatant hypocrisy.
The Scottish Executive are ultimately responsible for this iniquitous state of affairs. They have seen the recent Scottish Care/Cosla Cost of Care analysis, independently audited and accepted without demur, so they know the facts. However, they refused to give financial help. God knows, they can find funding for schemes they consider suit their political aspirations.
If appropriate funding is not available soon, every care home in Scotland will close and thousands of men and women will be cast aside, either on the grounds that their care cannot be afforded, or because the Scottish Executive believes them to be electorally insignificant.
Joe Campbell,
chief executive, Scottish Care,
54a Holmston Road, Ayr.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article