3/5
Arts councils and executives may enjoy applauding themselves for acts of empire-building benevolence, but, as The Arches Theatre Festival has already proved, the cutting edge has little to do with them. Now in its second week, these two shows prove once again how cash-strapped young Turks can succeed through creative will.
Glenn Neath's Romcom, produced by London's Rotozaza Company, is possibly the most deceptively titled experiment ever. Two actors wearing headphones - different performers every night - follow recorded instructions while a series of impressionistic images play out and punctuate their affair from first love to last rites and beyond. Talk about flying blind.
The result, last night bravely played by Paul Nolan and Alison Peebles, resembles one of Godard's 1960s movies, full of jump-cut montages between close-ups of blank-eyed lovers and excursions into heavily captioned symbolism. And, as well as comedy, it's a complex study of compatibility
and communication.
The fledgling Nomad Company are just daring as they take on the linguistics fripperies of Enda Walsh's Misterman. Here, saintly Thomas McGill is a man of beatific leanings, whose self-belief belies the doubts of his Christian name. With devils and angels on his shoulder, salvation comes through the seemingly untouchable Adele. Keeping one's head in the clouds, alas, can take you to dangerous places.
Graham Kerr's portrayal in Mark Westbrook's production is a textbook study of how seemingly innocent brooding can turn nasty. Rather than go for fire and brimstone overload Kerr sensitively underplays things in a work of gentle brutality which, like Romcom, still needs more flesh on its bones yet. If the powers that be pay attention, it could happen.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article