ALLY McCoist, the former Rangers and Scotland footballer, has settled his (pounds) 2m divorce settlement after a meeting with his estranged wife, Allison.
The settlement comes less than a week after his high-profile divorce court appearance was postponed for a second time because he had a bacterial infection.
McCoist said last night: ''I can confirm that I have settled my divorce case. We're both very happy that this difficult matter has been resolved. We now want to get on with our lives and look after our children.''
It is understood that the McCoists met yesterday for almost four hours in the offices of the TV pundit's solicitors, Harper Macleod, in Gordon Street, Glasgow, where a deal was worked out.
Rod McKenzie, a partner with the firm, said last night: ''I am not able to go into the specifics of what was discussed today involving Mr and Mrs McCoist and their solicitors. But I can confirm that both parties left our offices in Glasgow content with the outcome.''
No details of the settlement were available. A source close to McCoist suggested: ''Plainly Ally wouldn't be content if he was paying what his wife had been asking for. We can assume that he has agreed something less than this.''
However, in turn, given that Mrs McCoist was prepared to turn up in the full glare of publicity twice at court, she is not likely to have settled for much less than she was demanding.
The millionaire television personality's wife was seeking a divorce pay-off of (pounds) 2m plus an allowance of (pounds) 4000 a month.
McCoist did not contest the divorce - on the grounds of his unreasonable behaviour - and the couple had agreed arrangements for looking after their sons Alex, nine, and five-year-old twins, Mitchell and Argyll. However, he opposed the massive cash settlement which would have claimed almost half of his estimated (pounds) 5m
fortune.
The divorce case was supposed to start at the Court of Session in Edinburgh nine days ago, but was delayed when a doctor's certificate was produced saying the absent McCoist was suffering from ''symptoms of significant viral illness''.
However, Morag Wise, representing Mrs McCoist, told the court McCoist had left the home he still shared with his wife at 6.30pm the previous evening and had not returned until 6.30am. Her client had seen no signs of ailment then.
Two days later, a request from Janys Scott, advocate and counsel for McCoist, to reschedule the case for February 3 was granted.
Barring the failure of yesterday's agreement being made formal, that case will now not be necessary.
A tabloid newspaper photographed the former striker driving his children to football practice on the same day lawyers handed in a second sick note to court. McCoist was pictured dropping off two of his sons in Port Glasgow less than five hours after missing the hearing.
Friends later claimed he drove his children because his wife was absent from the family home on the birthday of his eldest son.
The divorce battle between the footballer and the model who was once crowned Miss Sunderland began two years ago, after his affair with Patsy Kensit, the actress.
McCoist is said to earn (pounds) 250,000 a year from his appearances on ITV1's football programme The Premiership and BBC 1's Question of Sport.
He is said to own property in Portugal, have a financial interest in pubs in East Kilbride and Aviemore, and is believed to have made more than (pounds) 1m from shares in Beat 106, the Glasgow radio station.
McCoist also owns a home at Formakin, near Langbank, and an eight-roomed home at Bridge of Weir, both Renfrewshire.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article