CASUAL Post Office workers stole cheques payable to the Inland Revenue
worth #7m and cashed them in a series of accounts opened under bizarre
names, according to a report out yesterday.
Spending watchdog the National Audit Office said the payee name on the
cheques was altered and cashed in names such as Inlandi Revendi.
The ''highly organised fraud'' involved cheques worth a total of
#7.68m and was first spotted in 1989. By 1990, the operation had grown
to such proportions that 20 cheques a week were being fraudulently
cashed.
About #5.88m was stopped within the banking system, leaving #1.8m
unaccounted for.
In one case, a building society accepted an altered cheque worth
#175,000.
In its review of the accounts of Customs and Excise and the Inland
Revenue, the NAO also said checks on 1.7 million traders for VAT
purposes uncovered underpayments of #1.1 billion in 1990.
In another fraud operation -- linked to the theft of the #7m of
cheques -- cheques known as payable orders with a value of just over #1m
were stolen. These were sent out by the Inland Revenue to repay tax to
taxpayers between 1989 and 1991.
The report said Inland Revenue computerised clearing checks were
largely successful in stopping forged and fraudulently increased payable
orders.
Up to August 1991, three orders with a face value of #875,215 were
stopped by routine checks without loss.
A number of arrests were made in both areas, and the Post Office has
tightened up its recruitment checks, but taxpayers were still being
asked to write cheques in a way that made fraud more difficult, the
report said.
Since the Inland Revenue started investigating, the number of
fraudulent encashments of incoming cheques has dropped dramatically, to
just two a week in July 1991, it added.
On VAT, the report said arrears were up on 1989 by just under 4% to
#977m, an increase blamed largely on problems faced by traders with high
interest rates and the recession.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article