The biggest project in history for evidence of non-human civilisations
is underway
ON October 12 last year Nasa celebrated the 500th anniversary of
Columbus' discovery of America by starting the biggest search for ET in
history.
The world's largest radio telescope, the 1000ft dish at Arecibo in
Puerto Rico, and the Goldstone Tracking Station, in the Mojave Desert,
Southern California, began scanning the heavens for evidence of
non-human civilisations at 7pm GMT.
This 10-year $100m programme, aimed at establishing whether we are
alone in the galaxy, has been proceeding for six months. In that time
deep space has been examined hundreds of times more thoroughly than all
preceding Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence projects combined, so
far without significant result.
SETI has roots going back to the last century when it was suggested
that pine trees be planted in the shape of right-angle triangles over a
vast area of Siberia so that we may contact the inhabitants of the moon.
Another suggestion was to dig a 20-mile-wide ditch across the Sahara,
fill it with paraffin and light it! In 1983 the wealthy Percival Lowell
had an observatory built at Flagstaff, Arizona, with the specific
intention of studying the ''advanced civilisation'' on the planet Mars.
Today we listen for ET's radio signals from other stars.
Each era uses the means available to it. The problem with radio being
that ET may communicate with some other at present unknown technology.
Back in the days when scientists were first experimenting with ''Hertz
waves'' no-one thought of them as a means of communication. Astronomers
actually said then that there might be some unknown way for
civilisations in space to confer. Even when radio technology was
developed it was initially dismissed as being useful for this purpose.
Now SETI scientists discuss endlessly which radio wave bands are best
for making searches. Of course there may be some other method adopted in
future which they regard today as unlikely. An example could be the
curious quantum effect that seems to make particles influence each other
instantaneously over vast distances. Perhaps in 100 years this will be
the main thrust of SETI and a century later something else, and so on.
There is a philosophy behind their attitude. They believe that
although it would take decades or centuries for messages to pass back
and forth across the immense reaches of space, the ''conversations''
would be between individual civilisations rather than individual people.
The likelihood of there being civilisations similar to ours, in as
much as they want to chat on the phone, is all part of a formula at the
heart of this thinking. It is called the Drake Equation.
Frank Drake, an astronomer at the University of California, has been
pushing SETI for more than 30 years and set up the SETI Institute in the
mid-eighties. He made the first modern radio search for ET back in 1960.
His analysis of the problem boiled down to this: first take the number
of stars in the Milky Way Galaxy, which is currently believed to be
about four hundred billion.
Determine how many of these are stars like our sun -- the proportion
turns out to be around 10%, so we have 40 billion.
Recent observations by astronomical satellites indicate that possibly
10% of these if not more have planets. Now we are down to four billion.
From here on the assumptions pile up thick and fast. How many planets
are abodes of life? The number usually drawn out of the hat is one per
thousand stars or four million planets bearing life in our galaxy.
Of these it is assumed another one in a thousand produces a
civilisation roughly like our own.
If this guesswork is anywhere near accurate there should be a few
thousand civilisations out there. If only a handful of these are
interested in radio messaging one another we should be able to tune in
to them with Nasa's current programme.
There are two programmes under the one umbrella. The Targeted Search
concentrates on carefully examining the nearest 800 sun-like stars over
the next 10 years. The All Sky Survey will, as its name suggests,
investigate every part of the heavens over the same period, dissecting
the radio spectrum by examining more than a million channels
simultaneously. In previous attempts the problem was that whenever
something interesting was picked up, no-one realised it until the
results were analysed. By the time the radio telescopes were realigned
to go back and examine the source, it was gone. The computers being used
now are faster and programmed to be much smarter. They can recognise
what a scientist would find interesting and there and then concentrate
on that alone.
There are dozens of objections to the thinking behind the project.
Drake's equation contains too many unknown quantities. Even the
supposedly hard astronomical data is still greatly guesswork.
Another stumbling block is that we do not know enough about these
civilisations supposedly like our own. Here is the biggest question mark
of all.
Although we are acquainted well enough with the problems associated
with the immensity of space, consideration has to be afforded to the
immensity of time.
Human civilisation has evolved explosively in terms of cosmic time. A
million years ago we were bright pack animals. A hundred thousand years
ago the packs were evolving into family based tribal units. What we call
civilisation is fewer than 10,000 years old and even that has changed
dramatically in nature and complexity over the past 1000, and
particularly the past 100 years. The rate of change is accelerating. In
all probability we would be lost in the world of a century hence. The
world of a thousand years in the future is unimaginable, but it is safe
to say that the changes in nature and complexity will continue.
The problem is then that what we regard as civilisation might merely
be a brief transitory phase in the evolution of intelligent species such
as our own. Whether we destroy ourselves or use technology to change
ourselves, in 1000 years' time the curtain could well have come down on
human civilisation as we know it.
In our 10 billion-year-old galaxy, civilisations could wink in and out
of existence. The 4000 ET phone calls may have rung once briefly before
anyone picked up the phone.
* Lost messages? Some interesting signals picked up by SETI
investigators in the past 20 years:
* August 17, 1977: Ohio State's receiver picks up a signal from
Sagittarius. The scientist who examines the printout scribbles ''Wow!''
beside it.
* October 10, 1986: Again from the region of Sagittarius, this was one
of around 40 interesting signals detected by the Harvard META project.
* August 14, 1989: Another META pickup this time from Virgo.
* August 16, 1989: Like the rest; when the META people at Harvard came
to examine this signal from Pisces it had stopped.
* May 9, 1990: Parkes radio telescope in Australia detected an
artificial-looking signal from Ophiuchus.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article