There's not so much of a welcome in the hillside these days, not if
you're English and upset the Welsh nationalist extremists. Torcuil
Crichton reports on a campaign of smouldering resentment that is
threatening to explode.
--------------------------------------------------------
THE beams in John Latter's cottage date from 1765. These and the other
vernacular features of the house are, he says, the real cultural
contribution of the Welsh. The smoke detector on the ceiling between the
beams is circa 1993, symbol of the intrusion of a darker aspect of
modern native culture into the life of the Englishman who has chosen to
make his home here.
The fire alarm is one of four in the small house in Newcastle Emlyn in
south west Wales.
Two streets away, farmers are exchanging comments on their penned
sheep in Welsh. The road signs are in Welsh, the schoolchildren are
taught in Welsh and a large part of the day's television output, if you
choose S4C, is in Welsh. Having the language would be a positive
advantage.
John Latter sits behind the window, spotting nationalists and Welsh
language activists among the passers-by. He feels he is hated by them,
that people he knows snub him in the street when acknowledging him would
be embarrassing in front of other, more ardent, Welsh speakers.
Mr Latter plans to install unbreakable bandit glass behind the
wooden-framed windows soon. He has taken other precautions. The family
have regular fire drills; they sleep in their beds wearing tracksuits.
The phone is almost certainly tapped.
''All calls are monitored,'' according to the terse message on the
answering machine which is only the beginning of the elaborate screening
act Mr Latter goes through before a face-to-face meeting. Mr Latter, and
12 other English families in Wales, are living under siege in their own
homes.
His Education First campaign to have English given equal status to
Welsh in local schools where the native language is the main means of
communication has ensured that Mr Latter has been blacklisted by
nationalist extremists and his life threatened.
The threat was delivered last November in letters to himself and 12
other English people living in Wales who were considered to be
anti-Welsh by Meibion Glyndwr, the embryonic Welsh terrorist
organisation which over the past decade has mounted a firebombing
campaign against holiday cottages and estate agent properties in the
north of Wales, along the border and in London.
The letter reads: ''You are an English colonist. You are racist and
anti-Welsh. You are on Meibion Glyndwr's blacklist. You must leave Wales
by March 1, 1993, or we will take revenge and you won't dare breathe. Go
home you imperialist scum.''
Apart from the last line, in English for added effect, the tirade is
written in Welsh. The letters signify a new development in the
anti-English campaign, extending it from firebombing empty holiday homes
and spreading from the north west of the country to the lower reaches of
Wales. So far nothing has happened, but Mr Latter is watchful.
He cannot fathom what he calls the arrogance of a minority of native
Welsh speakers who want the education system geared positively towards
the language. ''I support Welsh education but I believe there is a place
for English and all other languages in this very large country,'' he
said, before adding: ''It is not true that Welsh is the first language
here. There are pockets of 70 to 80% Welsh speakers but it depends on
how small you make the pockets. Here you either take a very servile
attitude to Welsh or you go your own way. Basically, they don't like the
English. I think it's historical, not just because we've arrived here in
alleged droves.''
The English arrived, and they did come in their droves, in the early
1980s -- on the back of the property boom in the south. They tend to
stay in their own enclaves, organise their own social circles, have the
economic power to buy up village shops and easily afford the small
houses whcih could be a first step on to the property ladder for young
locals. Mostly they are articulate, educated and resented, and they have
had a polarising impact on rural Wales. The net effect of the migration
of English settlers and holiday home owners into Anglesey, say
sociologists, is the equivalent to moving 200,000 non-English speakers
into a large English city.
Wales, of course, was anglicised a long time before the 1980s. The Act
of Union, with its declared aim that Wales should be ''for ever from
henceforth incorporated united or annexed to and with the Realm of
England'' was fashioned in 1536, a century after the rebel prince Owain
Glyndwr (in whose name the modern arson campaign has been launched) laid
the foundations for a Welsh nation state with a parliament, civil
service and treasury. The century of Owain Glyndwr also saw the
accession of Henry Tudor to the throne of England and it was under his
son, Henry VIII, that the union was forged as a deliberate move to
absorb the Welsh identity, unlike the later treaty with Scotland which
respected our separate institutions.
AFTER that Welshness and Wales survived only because a cultural
conciousness focused on the language, which remains the central and most
emotive issue at the core of Welsh politics. By the middle of the
nineteenth century Welsh sentiments found voice in the stirring national
anthem Hen Wlad fy Nhadau (Land of my Fathers) and electorally through
the non-conformist Liberals. But Wales by that time, even though 90% of
the people spoke Welsh, was a unionist and anglicised country.
At the turn of the century the first Welsh Party was formed from the
ranks of the parliamentary Liberals and an idealised vision of Home Rule
became the main inspiration for Saunders Lewis, the father of Plaid
Cymru, which came into being in 1925. But it was not until the 1950s
that Plaid Cymru became a political party proper. It was not until 1951
that a Minister for Welsh Affairs became a post within the UK government
and not until 1964 that the post of Secretary of State for Wales was
achieved, nearly 70 years after its Scottish equivalent.
By then the mythology and the symbolism of twentieth-century Welsh
nationalism had been established. The Burning of the Bombing School (the
fire of Lleyn) in 1936 was a seminal event. It resulted from Plaid
Cymru's despair at the insensitivity of the authorities in locating a
military airfield in the Welsh-speaking heartland. Saunders and two
others turned to direct action, setting fire to the site before handing
themselves in to police and admitting their technical, but not their
moral, guilt.
A jury in Caernarfon would not convinct them so it was necessary to
stage an Old Bailey trial, at which they were sentenced to nine months'
imprisonment. The incident is still a rallying point for the Welsh
national cause. It was the first time, since the days of Glyndwr that
criminal charges had been brought against the campaigners for Welsh
independence.
Civil disobedience became rooted in the cause of independence. The
activities of the Welsh Language Society in campaigning for the
language, for Welsh roadsigns and for Welsh broadcasting, embraced
direct action. ''Destruction of property may be essential to prevent
violence to people and it is a positive duty of anyone who feels
responsibility to his fellow man to be ready to take this course of
action,'' stated their manifesto. No-one knows who was responsible for
the television masts falling, but fall they did, and Welsh language
television was in place a decade before similar concessions were made to
the Gaelic-speakers of Scotland.
But nationalism in Wales is not a particularly powerful political
force. According to themselves, prospects for the Party of Wales have
never been better. At the 1992 election they secured four seats, their
highest number ever, and 9% of the vote, less than half that achieved by
the SNP in Scotland's ''Independence election''. The truth is that
Wales, like Scotland, is dominated by Labour, in its elections and in
its soul.
There were 27 Labour MPs, five Conservatives, and one Liberal Democrat
to go along with the four Plaid Cymru when the Welsh Grand Committee met
in Cardiff during stock-taking week, in which the Welsh Office offered
the same baubles as Ian Lang delivered to the other Celtic fringe of the
United Kingdom.
In Cardiff, before all the MPs rushed back to Westminster for a
Maastricht vote, Labour kept making the right noises. Neil Kinnock was
quickly on his feet to demand an elected assembly for Wales, a
devolutionist concept he never warmly embraced in his time as leader of
the Opposition and a point picked up on by a Plaid Cymru MP.
But the rhetoric sounds even more empty than it does on equivalent
Scottish exchanges. The listener is left feeling that in some senses
Wales is a culture in search of nationhood, not a country in search of
independence.
Failure to appreciate Welshness has left another English settler, Jan
Sutton, confused and bewildered by the threat her shop received from
Meibion Glyndwr for refusing to display a poster written only in Welsh.
The shop's policy is bilingual, her husband insisted. Now she makes
every effort to engage her Welsh-speaking clients in order to patch over
bad relations. She can say hello and thank you to Mrs Jones in Welsh but
she cannot understand a simple request, delivered deliberately in the
native tongue and with a wink, to buy some bread.
In their conversation on Welsh language and education Mrs Jones and
Mrs Sutton introduce contradictions at every turn. There is a slight,
polite tension, an unresolved disagreement on fundamentals left hanging
in the air. But when the Welsh language is not the charming Celtic
twinkle of Mrs Jones the Bread, it is as fierce and arrogant a culture
as English can be, as the owners of holiday homes have discovered to
their cost over the past 13 years.
Within a year 40 cottages had been torched. Within five years
insurance companies were offering #50,000 rewards for information.
EDWIN Jones is not a terrorist. As he dons the paramilitary costume of
his Meibion Glyndwr Colour Party he has to be coached to look tough for
the camera. Shoulders back please, stare hard.
The Meibion Glyndwr Colour Party is a pressure group which for seven
years has organised a march in Abergele, in North Wales, in memory of
the two nationalists of the Free Wales Army who blew themselves up in
1969, while preparing a bomb which was to have been placed on the
railway line on which the Prince of Wales was travelling to his
investiture.
Edwin Jones is good as a tour guide to burnt-out holiday cottages in
the area, passing on the way dozens of for sale signs, indicating that
the property boom in this part of Wales is well and truly over.
It is no coincidence that Meibion Glyndwr has killed no-one in the 200
holiday home attacks, Jones maintains. ''They are highly organised and
well co-ordinated. They must watch the house for months beforehand and
there must be quite a lot of them to co-ordinate attacks.'' Police
maintain it is lucky that no-one has died yet.
SOME people have been accused of terrorism. Sion Aubrey Roberts, a
21-year-old machine operator, was found guilty at Caernarfon Crown Court
on two charges of possessing explosive material and of sending
incendiary devices to two senior North Wales policemen and two
Conservative politicians. His two co-accused were acquitted after
spending 14 months in jail awaiting trial after having been refused
bail.
The Welsh letterbombs trial lasted 41 days in Caernarfon Crown Court
and was remarkable not just because it cost #3 million. It was the first
time M15 agents had given evidence in open court on counter-insurgency
operations on the British mainland.
The trial judge over-ruled a public interest immunity certificate
issued by Home Secretary Kenneth Clarke designed to suppress evidence of
MI5's involvement. An argument that the agents of state must give
evidence in camera was also over-ruled. Agents stood in court giving
details of monitoring and bugging activities, although friends of the
accused are convinced that the men giving the evidence were reading a
script prepared for them by those involved in the actual operation.
It emerged during the eight-week trial that police and the security
services launched an elaborate surveillance operation on Roberts. For
four months they watched his every movement within his flat from hidden
observation posts, presenting video evidence to the court of his
experiments with explosive materials.
MI5 involvement probably came about because the Welsh police have had
a remarkably poor record in tackling Meibion Glyndwr. In more than 12
years of activity, the police achieved only 19 convictions for minor
offences after 200 incidents of arson and letterbombing. The
perpetrators of the arson campaign have been well shielded by people who
support the aims, if not the methods, of Meibion Glyndwr.
Sion Roberts -- a chubby, immature-looking member of the Covenanters,
a small group aiming to free Wales by the end of the century -- has now
earned his place in the nationalist hall of fame. Whether M15
involvement prevents further violence or builds support for the
terrorists is not yet known.
Both organisations are in search of a new raison d'etre in the 1990s.
Meibion Glyndwr because the tide of holiday home ownership has been
stemmed, not by their activities but by economic conditions. And MI5 has
turned more attention to domestic intelligence gathering because there
is no Cold War left for it to fight. But the letterbombing trial has
demonstrated that the security forces are no nearer to penetrating the
shroud of secrecy around Meibion Glyndwr. The letterbombers and the
arsonists may be a fringe group deplored by the mainstream parties but
whether effective action can be taken against them before someone burns
in their bed is anyone's guess.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article