DOUBLE killer Benjamin Laing was jailed for life yesterday -- with a
recommendation he should serve at least 25 years -- for the murders of
bank clerk Alison Manwaring and her father Matthew.
As Laing, who was born in Paisley, was unanimously convicted by the
jury of six men and six women at the Old Bailey there was applause and
cheering in the public gallery.
Mark Manwaring, 27 -- sole survivor of the once happy family --
punched the air with his fist, before collapsing in tears. He put his
arm round the man his sister was about to marry, 32-year-old Gordon
Healis. Mr Healis also wept uncontrollably.
Both had sat in the back of court throughout the tense, three-hour
50-minute wait for the verdicts. They had attended each day of Laing's
five-week trial.
Laing showed no emotion as Judge Robert Lymbery said he recommended he
should serve a minimum of 25 years: ''Whether the Home Secretary will
then find it safe to release you must be a matter for him -- he should
be on his guard.
''You are a dangerous man, capable of extreme violence. You are
capable of deceit and dishonesty. You are utterly ruthless and have a
clever and able mind.''
Laing had shown only arrogance, not remorse, throughout. He had turned
on crocodile tears while giving the jury a false story in his defence.
Laing's mother cried in the public gallery as her son was led to cells
but a man near her shouted: ''I hope you rot in hell, you bastard.''
Earlier, Matthew Manwaring's two brothers -- also in the gallery --
clapped as Laing was convicted.
The 25-year-old van driver from Beckton, London, had denied the
murders committed on April 23 last year.
Laing gunned down Mr Manwaring, a 62-year-old widower -- shooting him
through the heart at point blank range with a sawn-off, pump-action
shotgun.
He had duped his way into the Manwaring home in Aldersey Gardens,
Barking, east London, after pretending he wanted to buy a Ford Cabriolet
car the family had advertised.
He then confronted Mr Manwaring's 24-year-old daughter Alison as she
arrived home from an evening with her fiance. He handcuffed her, then
tortured and sexually assaulted her before finally strangling her.
Afterwards, he dismembered their bodies in the bathroom -- cutting
each into seven separate pieces. He put them into 10 plastic sacks and
drove them away to bury later in a ''common and unhallowed hole'' he dug
in his girlfriend's back garden in Abbey Wood, south London.
He later sold the car he had stolen from outside the Manwarings' home
for #7500 at auction.
However, Laing's ''real motive was born out of a desire to murder and
to profit from doing so'', Mr Michael Stuart-Moore, QC, prosecuting, had
told the court.
''He had set his heart on murdering someone.''
After the jury gave their verdicts, Mr Stuart-Moore told them of an
additional ''quite extraordinary feature in this case''.
He said Laing had sent Mr Mark Manwaring a bogus letter in the hope of
putting police and the Manwaring family off his scent. It purported to
come from Miss Manwaring and said she and her father had simply gone
away for a break together.
The letter was signed ''Love Always In God'' -- the capital letters
virtually spelling Laing's name.
''It illustrated the total arrogance of the man who killed Mark's
sister and father and believed he could get away with that crime,'' said
Mr Stuart-Moore.
''Had he been acquitted he would have had the last laugh. He never
intended it to be noticed and it nearly did go unnoticed.''
After the case, Mr Manwaring, an RAF navigator, called for a
referendum on hanging. He said the reason for increasing crime levels
was because ''there was no bloody deterrent''.
''The streets have got to be given back to the police and the decent
people of this country,'' he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article