The BBC's Julian Wilson has an air of detached elegance, but he is a
man who cares passionately about his racing, finds Ian Paul
THE ELEGANT accent, BBC manners and hospitable smile go with the job
but, in Julian Wilson's case, what you see is not all there is. Beneath
that official Beeb profile, Wilson is a man of passionate opinion,
especially about the racing game in which he has been involved for more
than 30 years. And any man who can become animated about Swindon Town FC
must have depths of emotion beyond the norm.
Son of the renowned Daily Mirror sports writer Peter Wilson, Julian
has been the BBC TV racing correspondent since 1966, has owned and
managed a bloodstock agency and stud for 20 years and is lucky enough to
have owned a winner of that ''classic'' for two-year-olds, the Gimcrack
Stakes. He, therefore, qualifies on a number of counts to comment on the
state of racing business. And he does not mess about with euphemisms.
The product, he insists, is not what it was. ''The blame for that lies
firmly and squarely with the bookmakers. They want more and more
meetings. Consequently, there is a lot of mediocre racing, the cream is
spread too thinly and the punters get a poor deal. In the days of not so
long ago there was a big race every week which was guaranteed to be a
cracking race. Nowadays, trainers can go for a Beverley race or a
Chepstow race or abroad and the good horses avoid each other. For the
bookies it is never mind the quality just give us the width.''
He uses that argument to defend the decline in BBC TV coverage of a
sport which is now given far greater mileage by Channel Four. ''I can
see the argument of my head of department or programme editor when they
say racing is not producing the product to justify televising.
''The thing about Channel Four is that they put on a racing programme,
something we don't do any more. Sadly for them, they don't get a very
big audience, about 800,000 average, and that doesn't pay the bills.
''Now they have to get their own advertising they are struggling. Good
luck to them but I don't know how long it will last.''
BBC covers so many other minority sports now that the competition for
air space is greater, but Wilson does not shrink from criticism of his
own channel. ''The retrogressive step is the Sport On Friday programme
which is unnecessary. It is just a mish-mash of Sportsnight stories
etc., and is a small budget programme. But what it has done is eat into
our midweek racing time.''
Perhaps with a diplomatic eye towards his paymasters, he redresses the
balance by pointing out that the coverage of Cheltenham's Festival will
not be hampered on the Tuesday by the Budget and that the Grand National
meeting will include five races live on the Friday for the first time.
But it is when Wilson looks at the slump which has caused immense
heart searching in the racing industry that the frustration speeds to
the surface. ''There is recession within the recession in our industry.
It came about because the racehorse as a commodity became more heated
than anything during the 1980s. First of all, Robert Sangster came in to
turn his horse racing interests into a business. Then the Maktoums
arrived, took him on and they competed to buy the best horses.
''They tried to outbid each other and they bought the best yearlings
in the world and raced them here. But the prices went through the roof.
Suddenly people started to realise that, with the prize money structure
we have -- which is pitiful -- the sums didn't add up.
''The bottom line is that if you owned every horse in training at
present you would be losing #12,000 per horse. The average cost of a
horse in training at Newmarket is #15,000 and the average horse in
training only wins #3000.
''At the moment you can't give away horses. People are not buying them
because they can't afford the training fees, which are too expensive.
But that is not entirely the trainers' fault. There is so much
bureaucracy there are 101 costs before you get anywhere near the
starting stalls.
''For 90 per cent of the people involved it is a luxury sport and is
left to fall by the wayside in a recession. As an industry we are on our
uppers.
''It is desperate. Eight out of ten horses at sales are not sold. Even
with a very good horse you are selling for nothing.''
IN THE circumstances you might not be surprised to learn that in the
stocks beside the bookies Wilson places the Government. ''It continually
turns a blind eye to our problems. There is supposed to be four and a
half billion pounds spent on gambling in this country and racing gets
back barely #40m. Bookies are not putting enough into racing, but just
as important the Government is taking out far too much in tax and not
returning enough to the grass roots.'' He believes the proper way
forward would be to turn the Tote over to racing and pump the returns
into the sport.
Wilson, who lives five miles from Newmarket with his second wife,
Allison, has fond connections with Scotland, where he began his
newspaper and racing education straight from school. He was sent north
to spend two years with the Noon Record, the racing daily then published
along with the Daily Record. It was there in Hope Street, Glasgow, that
he and I first rubbed shoulders as we began to unravel the mysteries of
sub-editing, lay-out and six cross doubles. From Glasgow he moved to
Newmarket to become the Mirror's correspondent there and after a spell
in Manchester and some other jobs, among them racing expert for the
Sunday Mail, he secured the BBC job, despite competition from 800
applicants.
He started his own bloodstock company, with a stud in County Mayo
(''it is more economic there''), manages a few horses for various
clients and will tell you of two horses who virtually changed his life.
Tumbledown Wind, a two-year-old who was as fast as the name suggests,
cost him 4800 guineas but won four out of six races, climaxing with the
Gimcrack Stakes.
He did not volunteer how much he received when he sold the horse at
the end of the season but we can have a fair guess when he says: ''It
enabled me to buy my house and set me up for life.'' The other horse
that would be high on his list of favourites is Pontenuovo, who won the
Royal Hunt Cup at Royal Ascot at 50-1 in 1990. It was Wilson, wearing
his manager's hat, who supervised the programme that led to the great
triumph. ''The satisfaction we got from that was very special. We
planned for 18 months the strategy to win that race and to see it come
to fruition was marvellous.'' Did he make a few bob in the ring? ''The
horse did not go unfancied'' is the enigmatic reply.
It may not have beaten the ''touch'' he had when the ill-fated
Shergar, trained by his friend Michael Stoute, won the Derby. Like many
racing folk he associates major personal events with racing happenings,
viz: ''I got engaged for the second time in Shergar's year, 1981. That
was quite a day. I had backed the horse at 33-1. The winnings paid for
the engagement ring with a few quid left over. We got married on the
Monday after Royal Ascot in 1982.'
He has written a number of racing books, notably the unofficial
biography of Lester Piggott (''His wife didn't talk to me for two
years''). He remains a fervid supporter of Swindon Town but his stint in
Scotland did not leave him untouched by the football frenzy. He looks
for three results on a Saturday, that of Swindon, then Bristol City
(''They are our west country rivals and I look to see if they have
lost'') and Partick Thistle. ''They are my Scottish team and I follow
their fortunes.'' He has made his choices for this summer's classics at
odds we will not match. They are Zafonic, whom he backed at 8-1 for the
2000 Guineas; Tenby, for whom he got 25-1 for the Derby; and Criquette,
his 33-1 bet for the Oaks. You have been told.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article