PLANS to build the world's first commercial wave-powered electricity
generating plant in Shetland are under threat because of a lack of
Government support, it was claimed yesterday.
A UK-Dutch consortium, which includes Scottish Hydro-Electric, wants
to build the plant at a cost of between #5m and #10m at Fugla Ness.
Mr Richard Fenton, from civil engineers Acer Consultants, another
member of the consortium, said the generator would be able to produce
three megawatts -- 10% of Shetland's peak electricity needs.
He said the project should have qualified for 40% grant aid under the
EC's Thermie programme which supports renewable energy projects: ''But
the British Government failed to support us -- and that meant we
couldn't even get past the first base.''
The Shetland system would involve creating a trumpet-shaped cleft in a
rock face. This would channel waves into a reservoir built above sea
level so that the water could be used to drive a conventional
electricity generating turbine.
''It would be the first commercial wave-powered set-up in the world,''
said Mr Fenton, who is in Orkney to lobby support at a conference on
energy strategies for island communities.
''But without the support of the Government, the project, if not dead
and buried, is facing a bleak future.''
Professor Stephen Salter, an expert in wave power technology from the
Department of Mechanical Engineering at Edinburgh University, described
the Government's attitude as baffling.
''You would expect your supporting team to be shouting and cheering
for you in Brussels,'' he said. ''But they are doing the very opposite.
It's almost as if they don't want it to be a success.''
A Department of Trade and Industry spokesman said last night that the
Dutch Government had put the proposal together for Thermie programme
funding.
''The British representative did not offer his support because he had
not been asked in advance to do so,'' the spokesman said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article