Elizabeth
Buie reports how high street stores which adopt a policy of regular
price cuts have created an atmosphere of sales cynicism among shoppers
SHOPPERS for clothes have stopped trusting stores that offer an
endless stream of price cutting and have turned instead to slightly more
expensive, quality lines that they believe in, according to a report
produced yesterday.
Credibility has become a far greater issue than ever before, as
consumers shopping in stores that continuously discount lines feel they
can no longer believe the price they see before them.
As retailers have found that they must become more efficient to
survive, their policy of trying to tempt shoppers through their doors by
cutting prices has apparently backfired.
Consumers are now adopting the attitude that if the shops can afford
to slash prices, the goods were over-priced in the first place.
Retail analysts at Verdict Research are now warning that endless
price-cutting could actually harm trade in the clothing market. And they
also warn that as quality and design are cherished more by consumers,
prices may creep up.
''The proportion of goods at #19.99 are going to be higher than the
#17.99s,'' predicts Ms Hilary Monk, author of Verdict Research's report.
''Retailers are trying to move towards 'everyday low prices'. They
have realised they have to reassure consumers that every time they go
into a store, they are going to get the best possible prices, instead of
leaving the customer thinking 'If I buy this now, it will have 20% or
30% off next week','' she adds.
Clearly, the policy of continuous discounting has proved bad for
customer morale and the customer's perception of the retailer.
''The recession-hit consumer has come to distrust mainstream retailers
that discount on an ongoing basis. The most conspicuous example of this
is The Burton Group. The company's specialist chains locked themselves
into an endless stream of price-cutting that was difficult for the
business to extricate itself from. The group's fashion multiples have
seen their market share fall from 6.2% in 1992 to 5.6% today,'' said a
spokesman for Verdict Research yesterday.
The Burton Group's own report and accounts confirm that discounting
has not been a successful strategy and that plans are now in place to
adopt a more realistic pricing policy to attract more customer
confidence.
Mr Sean Eddie, a retail analyst with Natwest Securities, sees the
Burton Group as a ''classic case'' of being forced to move away from its
dependence on continuous discounting.
''The problem is weaning the customer off the sale treadmill, and just
recently the group has been showing signs of achieving that. But they
are still perceived by the consumer as offering sufficiently low quality
out of sufficiently unsatisfactory outlets. The consumer is never
compelled to pay full price and has become inured to sales scenarios,''
he said.
The success story of the retail clothing industry is, say analysts,
Marks and Spencer.
''In the autumn and winter of 1992, Marks & Spencer responded to
stagnating sales by adopting Outstanding Value, which meant sharper
initial pricing,'' said Mr Eddie.
Marks and Spencer already had a loyal consumer base and has never
resorted to slashing prices across the board. As one analyst put it:
''You would be lucky to save the price of your bus ticket at some M&S
sales.''
Ms Monk said: ''The way in which Marks and Spencer put across its
message to the customer was very subtle -- it was done so that the
consumer did not feel there was an image of Marks' discounting, but that
it had just enhanced the value that much more.''
She feels that other stores are beginning to follow its example,
putting more emphasis on quality and design. She picks out retailers
Next and River Island along with Marks & Spencer as offering distinctive
merchandise and the right balance between price and product quality.
But some other retailers, such as Oasis, Monsoon, and Hobbs are also
achieving success. Perhaps their designs are perceived as ''hot'' at
this particular time. Perhaps also there is a swing towards
better-designed and more imaginative clothing after what has been seen
as a relatively boring period in the retail clothing trade. Basic
women's items such as leggings, baggy jumpers and polo-necks are still
the premise of stores such as Marks & Spencer, whose own image for
women's and men's fashions has improved radically.
Referring to chains such as Oasis and Monsoon, Ms Monk says: ''It's
the right product and what the market wants at the moment. It's
something a little bit different and there is a bit more design input.
The prices are higher, but there is a demand for it.''
Mr Eddie says: ''There has always been in fashion an ability for niche
retailers to make money through being perceived as fashionable at that
particular time. You just have to look at Covent Garden and the trendier
parts of Glasgow to see that. But I am not sure if in general, without a
sufficiently fashionably strong product, you can get away with it.''
Etam has failed in its attempts to move its brand slightly upmarket,
providing a warning to others that the middle market in fashion remains
incredibly competitive, he says.
But if retailers face tough times, with virtually no elasticity in the
market, and, as some analysts believe, higher underlying inflation than
Government statistics indicate, the news for the consumer is good.
''Consumers are getting a better deal. Retailers in the 1990s are
focused on giving the consumer greater value, whereas in the 1980s it
was all about 'value', which essentially meant charging bigger prices in
order to enhance the feel and the style of their shops and formats.
''Nowadays, most consumers are much more discerning and
price-sensitive, and much more cynical about the extent to which new
formats are necessarily value,'' said Mr Eddie.
Labour's spokesman for consumer affairs, Mr Nigel Griffiths, predicts
that the days of bogus sales claims are now coming to an end.
''People are now thinking twice before they buy just about anything,''
said Mr Griffiths.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article