A FATHER dropped his baby son from a 42ft bridge because he thought
the two-weeks-old infant was the devil, a court heard yesterday.
Mr Kevin Moy, 32, apparently believed he himself was the anti-Christ
and had to stop his son doing ''terrible things''.
A jury at the High Court in Glasgow heard the former laboratory
technician was convinced he and his son would destroy the world with a
super virus and were responsible for the Gulf War.
The court heard that his wife Eileen and other friends stopped him
from jumping over the parapet after his son, who died in hospital next
day.
Only two weeks earlier, Mr Moy had attended the birth of his son
Eoghan but later was said to have thought a birth mark on the baby's
head had been put there by the devil.
Mr Moy was also allegedly influenced by the ''devil number'' six. His
son was born on September 26 and his bank-card number was 666, the mark
of the beast, and sixes occurred in his lawyer's phone number.
The jury was told Mr Moy, of Alexander Street, Dumbarton, admitted to
police and psychiatrists what he had done.
However, his defence counsel Mr Kevin Drummond, QC, told the court Mr
Moy was pleading not guilty by reason of insanity at the time of the
offence.
Mr Moy denies that on October 10 last year he threw his son over a
bridge at Overtoun Burn, near Milton, Dumbarton, injuring him so
severely he died in hospital next day and that he murdered him.
Mr Craig Scott, prosecuting, said the Crown and the defence were
agreed that Mr Moy threw his son from the bridge while on a visit to the
area with his wife Eileen.
It was also agreed the accused then tried to throw himself over the
bridge, and that he was ''pale and shaking and that his eyes were
glazed'', and that shortly afterwards he tried to cut his wrists.
The prosecution and the defence also agreed that during a
tape-recorded interview that night Mr Moy admitted dropping his son from
the parapet.
Asked why he had done it, Mr Moy had replied: ''Because over the past
few days I came to believe I was the anti-Christ and my son was the
devil and the two of us had to be stopped or something terrible would
happen to everyone because of me and my baby. My intention was to finish
it.''
Mr Moy admitted during the interview that his wife had her back to him
when he dropped their baby and knew nothing about what he was going to
do.
The court heard that around 1988 Mr Moy developed ME, a viral
disorder, and his mental health appeared to deteriorate from then.
Consultant psychiatrist John Baird, 47, said he examined Mr Moy twice
and formed the view he was insane at the time of the offence and was
suffering from a severe mental illness and from an alienation of reason.
When he saw the accused last on December 29, he was still suffering
from a severe mental illness but his opinion was he was sane and fit to
plead.
Questioned by Mr Drummond, Dr Baird said he thought Mr Moy's illness
could be controlled by treatment in a mental hospital.
Consultant psychiatrist Thomas White, of Carstairs State Hospital,
said that Mr Moy believed if he did not kill himself and his baby the
world would be destroyed by them.
He said Mr Moy did not appreciate the ''wrongfulness of his actions''
at the time of the offence.
Mr White added that the accused was now sane and fit to plead but
needed treatment in a mental hospital.
The psychiatrist said that Mr Moy's marriage had been ''happy'' and
that he and his wife had looked forward to the birth of their baby.
The trial before Lord Mayfield continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article