HAVING browsed through fishing magazines almost every month over a
goodly number of years, it has only recently percolated through the
miasma of sand and sediment that loosely passes for my brain, that there
is a revolution going on. Towards the back of the aforesaid mags are the
familiar advertisements for fishing and fishing holidays in Scotland as
well as the rest of the UK. But a new phenomenon is gradually intruding
as I see destinations world-wide being advertised, catering to every
whim and vagary the angler might desire.
There are traditional destinations such as Norway and Iceland. British
anglers have been visiting Norway since the middle of last century --
the mighty rivers thundering down to the fiords being home to some very
large salmon. Nowadays you can try the river Aa, where June salmon
average around 19lb, with the best usually more than 40lb and the July
salmon, averaging 11lb, come with grilse and sea trout. All fly fishing,
a lodge where the food is unashamedly outstanding and all drinks
included (except spirits) will cost more than #3000 per rod per week.
The river Stjordal at prime time, including full board, car hire and
gillie, costs just a little more than half that -- around #1550.
Fishing in Iceland falls into similar price ranges. The Ranga river,
known for its stable water levels (intimating that many other rivers are
not), offers fly and spinning for salmon, sea trout, and Arctic char
with the bonus of brown trout up to 15lb. To cover the weekly cost,
write a cheque for #1700.
I knew about Iceland and Norway and had been saving for years for my
dream trip to Alaska with the five species of Pacific salmon,
magnificent wild rainbows, and grayling. That was about the extent of my
awareness of world fishing, until I paid closer attention.
The Kola peninsula in the north of Russia is the latest wilderness
opening up for the game angler. Roughly the size of Scotland and lying
inside the Arctic Circle, the Kola embodies the features that make for
fine salmon fishing. Tundra with peat bog and pine and birch forest, and
as yet without forestry, drainage, or agricultural schemes to degrade
the rivers, water quality is high, the season shorter than ours but more
prolific.
Fishing is fly only, single barbless hooks being the rule -- a rule
firmly enforced. One angler last year was fishing a double hook without
the barbs flattened which caught in his finger and he was taken by
helicopter to hospital to have it removed. The hospital reported the
facts to the fishing authorities and the owners of the camp were fined
$1000 and the angler declared persona non grata. They know how to look
after this valuable sport. A week at the peak of their season is not
cheap at around #3000, but think of the thrill of flying to Moscow and
Murmansk and being helicoptered daily to the best beats. Worth saving up
for.
As are the Falkland Islands, striking in their similarity to South
Uist in terrain, with magnificent sea trout for the fly fisher. Or
Argentina, with fishing in Patagonia on the Rio Grande for brown trout
up to 25lb.
I know I will never visit most of these destinations, but I also know
it is daily being made easier for me and any other inquisitive angler to
pick one exotic location and blow the hard-earned fishing fund on a trip
of a lifetime. I've been lucky enough to fish here and there abroad over
the last few years and have enjoyed taking a yellow-fin tuna off
Mauritius on the fly rod, a 120lb tarpon from shallow water during a
thunderstorm off Islamorada in the Florida Keys, and a 38lb Chinook
salmon from the Alagnak river in Alaska.
But these experiences have only served to reinforce the joys to be had
in Scotland. You need foreign travel to sharpen your awareness of what
you have at home. I wouldn't relinquish the joy of March on Helmsdale,
sea trout at night on the South Esk, or autumn on Tay or Tweed for
anything. And don't forget, these Scottish delights advertised in
fishing magazines all over the world will sound just as exotic to
anglers from abroad.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article