THE man cleared of the murder of drama student Amanda Duffy was
yesterday sentenced to 240 hours' community service for making
threatening telephone calls.
As he left Hamilton Sheriff Court, Francis Auld was pursued by angry
women yelling: ''Beastie Boy'' and ''Beast''.
In November 1992, Auld, 21, was acquitted of murdering Amanda Duffy,
19, when the jury agreed a not proven verdict.
Amanda Duffy's battered body was found at an isolated spot near
Hamilton town centre in May 1992.
In court, a defence agent described the lonely life of Auld since the
murder trial. He had been shunned by friends, was unable to sleep,
broody, and drank heavily.
He was, said his agent Mr Michael Gallacher: ''A man destined to be
regarded as the man who got off, rather than the man who was acquitted.
It is a legal fact he was acquitted.''
Auld appeared for sentence on charges of making malicious telephone
calls to two former friends, Mr Patrick Vandeleur and Mr David Miller.
Sentencing Auld to community service, Sheriff Hamish Stirling said:
''These offences were particularly despicable because they were directed
against those who supported you. I consider a custodial sentence
appropriate but you are a first offender and the law demands
alternatives are considered.''
Auld admitted that, in one of the calls, he threatened Mr Vandeleur,
of Hamilton and said: ''Patrick, you thought Amanda was the last. Well,
you're next, after Caroline.''
The reference to Caroline concerned Mr Vandeleur's girl friend,
Caroline Casey. In July 1993, Auld made a number of 5.30am calls to Mr
Vandeleur.
Fiscal William Craig said: ''Both she (Caroline) and Mr Vandelour took
what was said seriously.''
Mr Craig said that, following the Amanda Duffy trial, about 10 of
Auld's friends -- including the two who received the telephone calls --
had taken a collective decision that they wanted nothing further to do
with Auld. David Miller was delegated to tell him.
On 10 July, Mr Vandeleur and his girlfriend were in bed when they
received the first telephone call around 5.30am.
No-one spoke. This happened four times. There was a fifth telephone
call, and the voice of Francis Auld whispered: ''Patrick, Patrick,
Patrick . . .''
Recognising the voice as Auld's, Mr Vandeleur asked what he was doing.
It was then that Auld threatened him.
''Mr Vandeleur then asked Mr Auld what he was doing up at that time of
day.'' Auld told him he was always up at that time.
Mr Vandeleur then left the telephone off the hook, and wrapped it up
in a T-shirt before eventually unplugging it. The minute he replaced the
receiver, it rang again.
Later, at a funeral, Mr Vandeleur met Mr David Miller and told him of
the calls -- to discover that he, too, had been receiving telephone
calls where no-one spoke. He had received at least 13 telephone calls
around 5.30am.
Police were informed and line traces were placed on the two men's
telephones. ''This resulted in a number of successful line traces to the
home of Francis Auld,'' Mr Craig said.
Police raided Auld's home in August, 1993, and took Auld and his
parents into custody.
Auld admitted making the calls. He did not recollect the precise words
of his threat, but admitted making it.
After Auld left court, his girlfriend appeared before Sheriff Stirling
for sen
tence.
Carol Smith, 20, who now lives with Auld in England, admitted sending
hate mail to Mrs Kate Duffy, the mother of the murdered girl.
In the letter was a photograph of Mr and Mrs Duffy
next to the words: F---ing pathetic.
Sheriff Stirling admonished Smith and said: ''I am well satisfied that
you were under considerable stress -- and you are a first offender.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article