THE long battle for control of Lanark auctioneers Lawrie and Symington
Limited looks to be nearing its final conclusion -- and all indicators
suggest that the present board are about to lose out.
Earlier this week, the directors of Lawrie and Symington strongly
advised shareholders to ignore a takeover bid by the Edinburgh
investment company Caledonian Trust on the basis that the bid of 7p per
share, or a range of share and loan options, was ''neither realistic,
nor attractive.''
In the meantime, it has now emerged that Caledonian Trust require only
just over 15% acceptance from shareholders before they can claim
control.
This news comes in the wake of an oral agreement between Caledonian
Trust and the Elliot of Harwood Trust for the transfer of almost 1.2
million shares, some way in advance of the 64p offered in June by the
board of Lawrie and Symington to buy-in what represents a stake of over
32% in the company.
In their bid, Caledonian Trust detail the advantages of selling out,
and also advised farmers that all their queries would be answered on a
''hotline.'' From his office in Edinburgh yesterday Douglas Lowe, chief
executive of Caledonian Trust, said: ''Our hotline has been exceedingly
busy, and indeed we have had visits from several shareholders -- as well
as a number of calls from professional advisers acting on behalf of
interested parties.''
The bid, running to a document of 56 pages, reviews in some detail the
current state of the livestock auctioneering industry in Scotland. ''The
value of stock passing through Scottish auctioneers has fallen by over
40% in real terms in recent years, although there was a slight recovery
to a 38% fall in 1993, due to the much higher prices in that year --
primarily caused by the steep decline in the value of the pound in late
1992.
''If nothing else changed, this huge contraction in real turnover over
the last 10 years would have resulted in an approximately equal
reduction in profits, as marginal costs are very low. Fortunately for
the industry, change has been effected. This has been done in the better
firms by management, and in the poorer firms by circumstances.''
Caledonian Trust have chosen John Swan and Sons plc as an example of
how they see an auction company should be run. ''Swan's, during the past
five years, reported pre-tax profits with a bumper #376,000 in 1994.
''Lawrie and Symington, by contrast, only report #23,000 in this
bumper year, after #59,000 of asset sales and a trading position of a
#185,000 loss before asset sales, interest, and rent. Unless very
significant changes are made at Lawrie and Symington, the trend to lower
stock prices in 1994 has very serious implications.''
Mr Lowe has reservations over the plans of Lawrie and Symington to
buy-in the Elliot Trust shares. He said it was also very difficult to
see how a company in clear and obvious need of investment can afford to
buy-in its own equity.
Mr Lowe also discounted all suggestions that his company plans to
asset strip Lawrie and Symington. ''We are not going to close the
company down. There is so much potential just waiting to be realised in
the auction business.''
Caledonian Trust, in the bid, seek to remove virtually the entire
board of current directors, with the exception of the managing director
Iain Thomson, and leading farmer director Michael Clark, whose father
was previously in charge at Lanark for many years.
In terms of their obligations, it would now appear that the board of
Lawrie and Symington -- as with the directors of the William Low
supermarket chain in that recent takeover -- must seriously consider the
advice which they give to shareholders.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article