EASTENDERS star Gillian Taylforth's epitaph might be ''I give good
head,'' Mr George Carman, QC, told the High Court yesterday.
In his closing speech for The Sun, which is fighting a libel claim
brought by the couple over an alleged sex act in public, Mr Carman
referred to the video of a boozy party in which the 38-year-old actress
was seen simulating sex acts with a large sausage and a wine bottle.
''It may be that the unfortunate words of Gillian Taylforth -- 'I give
good head' -- uttered no doubt in jest on a film which she never thought
would see the light of day, may summarise what happened that evening and
may be her epitaph. I don't know,'' he said.
''But the truth of this case is that this was a foolish jape, probably
a dare from one partner to another when they had both had a significant
amount to drink, which they thought would never be seen because the
traffic would simply go past.''
Miss Taylforth, who plays Kathy Beale in the BBC soap, and Mr Knights,
39, are suing the newspaper for repeating a police allegation that they
had oral sex on the slip-road off the A1 in Hertfordshire, after a day
at Ascot races in June 1992.
Mr Carman said Miss Taylforth was ''attractively and sympathetically''
presented in the witness box as a lady suffering from immense distress
over the allegation.
''Her baby Jessica was waved in and out of the script as if Miss
Taylforth was president of the Mothers' Union,'' he said. ''But we know
that wasn't the true and whole picture of Gillian Taylforth.''
The side of her which
had been ''carefully concealed'' was revealed in the video and showed
''a woman capable of coarseness in front of other people, in front of
the camera when in drink''.
It showed ''sexual coarseness of a kind some of us might not find
particularly pleasing -- and something she didn't seem to be ashamed
about in any way''.
Miss Taylforth sat stony-faced as Mr Carman said the unpalatable truth
of the case was that it was riddled with improbability heaped upon
improbability to the point of being ''frankly incredible''.
Mr Carman said the case had a unique feature in the history of libel
actions, the ''strange coincidence'' that Miss Taylforth, who was
accused of oral sex in public, was filmed ''boasting'' about her own
capacity for such an act.
The coincidence was even stranger because Mr Knights, a man with a
catalogue of convictions, had ''freely admitted'' to the police that he
had committed that offence.
An attempt had been made to paint a picture of Constable Talbot, who
was in no doubt that he had caught the couple in the act, as ''some sort
of secret Wyatt Earp, dressed up in a stetson and holster'' at his local
shooting club.
The suggestion that Mr Talbot wanted to make a name for himself as the
officer who nicked Gillian Taylforth, was absurd.
''I don't know whether you go down in the Guinness Book of Records if
you nick an EastEnders' actress for oral sex on the A1 but, in fact, he
did not nick her -- he let her go home and got told off for it by his
inspector because he was over-compassionate.''
Miss Taylforth and Mr Knights, who live at Belmont Court, Highbury New
Park, north London, claim they pulled over for Mr Knights to be sick
when he suffered an attack of pancreatitis.
He undid his trousers to ease the pain and Miss Taylforth was leaning
towards him in concern, with her hand on his stomach, when the officer
arrived.
The Sun denies libel and says the story, which included the actress's
angry denial of the police accusation as a ''load of bullshit'', was
true.
However, if it was untrue, the Metropolitan Police were responsible as
they supplied the information, it says.
The hearing continues today.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article