''What will become of the Granton, Edinburgh
regional HQ of the quaintly-named British Gas
Scotland? There is open speculation that the
place will simply disappear. And yet, apart
from some small fuss from the unions and
the SNP, the rest is silence.''
BEFORE shares in British Gas were first offered to the public, back in
December 1986, there was a lot of heated debate about the wisdom of
replacing a nationalised monopoly with a private-sector monolith.
Was the Thatcher privatisation drive, while promising a stiff dose of
market rigour and the cobweb-dispersing winds of competition, simply
delivering more of the same, apart from inflated reward packages to
another complacent boardroom and risk-free windfall gains to punters
everywhere?
This side of Hadrian's Wall there was an equally high-octane
subsidiary debate about whether, if British Gas were to be broken up, a
viable privatised Scottish gas supply company could emerge from the
rubble.
The North British economy had been through a bad time, losing one
corporate headquarters after another. The promises of Ernest Saunders,
made in the heat of the Distillers takeover, had already proved
threadbare, before the DTI inspectors moved into Guinness. A number of
other chunky independent Scottish companies had fallen to hungry
predators. The battle for a separate Scottish TSB had been fought
through the courts and lost.
Scotland's economy was shedding some big corporate limbs and replacing
them with thin twiggy growth in danger of snapping when the next chill
wind blew through it. We were in danger of becoming a branch economy
with a capital B.
So some big Scottish names put their weight behind calls for British
Gas to be broken up into a number of private companies, including the
creation of Scottish Gas plc. Such a solution would not only inject more
competition into the UK gas market, they argued, it would start to
reverse the grievous losses of corporate autonomy Scotland had suffered
in the first half of the 1980s.
Sadly, Scottish advocates of a gas break-up proved to be ahead of
their time. Their kind of model was adopted much later, when electricity
and English water were privatised. But, despite all the objections, gas
was sold off in one piece.
Where are these voices now, I wonder, now that British Gas is to
undergo its most radical restructuring since that 1986 sale, in the wake
of last year's Monopolies and Mergers Commission inquiry?
For, far from creating a second opportunity to create an independent
Scottish Gas, the proposals floated by the British Gas board just before
Christmas could deprive Scotland of what little higher management
function it currently enjoys.
British Gas wants to scrap its traditional regional structure and
create five business divisions covering public gas supply, contract
trading, transportation and storage, retailing, and the service and
installation of gas central heating. It also wants to shed 20,000 jobs,
nearly a third of its current workforce, by 1997.
If that is what happens, what will become of the Granton, Edinburgh
regional headquarters of the quaintly-named British Gas Scotland? There
is open speculation that the place will simply disappear. And yet, apart
from some small fuss from the unions and the SNP, the rest is silence.
The MMC inquiry was the culmination of a bruising 18-month
confrontation between British Gas and the then-regulator Sir James
McKinnon. Less than a year ago, he, through Ofgas, was telling the MMC
British Gas should be carved up into 12 regional companies with separate
pipeline and gas-purchasing businesses.
In its final report last August, the MMC accepted some of the break-up
arguments, recommending that British Gas sell off its trading arm by
1997 and proposing a phasing-out of BG's domestic supply monopoly by
2002.
But, by last month, the monolith's survival was assured. First, on
December 17, British Gas revealed details of its own restructuring
plans, abandoning its current regional structure and replacing it with
the five new functional businesses.
Four days later, after MPs had departed for the Christmas hols, Trade
and Industry Secretary Michael Heseltine announced he was rejecting the
MMC's two main recommendations. British Gas would not be broken up,
provided it separated its transport and trading activities. However, the
domestic supply monopoly would be abolished by 1998.
In the wake of Mr Heseltine's announcement, the new Ofgas
director-general Ms Clare Spottiswoode reserved the right to call for
divestiture of parts of British Gas, if there was any sign of accounting
or cultural fiddling between the proposed separate business units. But,
she added in words which distanced her from the stance of her
predecessor, she was determined that the British Gas national monopoly
would not be replaced with a series of regional monopolies.
The relief etched on the face of British Gas chief executive Cedric
Brown was striking. The fears etched on the faces of many of BG's
workers and regional managers were less well documented. For the rest of
us, with Christmas and Hogmanay looming, the significance of what was
happening got lost somewhere between the turkey and the black bun.
In the cold light of a new year, the implications for the Scottish
interest look profound. The opportunity to create a Scottish gas utility
was lost back in 1986. Now we face the prospect of losing our branch
headquarters of the UK utility as well.
As regular readers will know, I do not always see eye to eye with the
SNP on the structural weaknesses in the Scottish economy or what to do
about them. But, on the threat posed by the British Gas restructuring
plan, the nationalists' forebodings are well-founded. This time the SNP
is not crying wolf.
So why are the other voices, raised so vociferously in 1986 in favour
of a break-up of British Gas and the creation of a separate Scottish Gas
company, now so silent? If we are to have a privatised ScotRail,
operating trains on track owned by a quite separate Railtrack, why is it
not possible to envisage a Scottish Gas, supplying customers through a
pipeline network, owned and operated by a quite different company?
With the electricity utilities, including ScottishPower and
Hydro-Electric, moving rapidly into the gas market and Mr Heseltine's
tighter timetable for ending BG's domestic supply monopoly, the issue of
regional monopoly no longer has even the force it had back in 1986.
There is a significant Scottish business waiting to be unlocked from
the Granton headquarters of British Gas Scotland, but the argument for
that course of action is going by default. Even the SNP, in warning of
the implications of the British Gas proposals, is pitching not for the
creation of a separate Scottish Gas but for the siting of the
headquarters of two of the five functional businesses proposed by BG in
Scotland.
One of the problems in getting any head of political steam behind the
former option is the relative invisibility of the Granton operation and
those who run it. In all my years as a business journalist, I cannot
remember the last time I visited the place. I have got to know the
senior personnel in depth in many other large Scottish companies. I
would be hard pushed even to name names at Granton.
That was as true in British Gas's days as a nationalised industry as
it is now. But such below-the-parapet anonymity does not invalidate the
main point. The British Gas restructuring plan will strip Scotland of
any meaningful corporate presence. Let's give this important issue a
real public airing before it is too late.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article