WILLIAM RUSSELL talks to Iain Sproat on his new role with a remit
which stretches from the Arts to sport
TOURISM is the most underestimated industry in the United Kingdom
according to Iain Sproat, the new junior minister at the Department of
Heritage.
After a decade in the political wilderness, making money outside
Parliament it has to be said, Iain Sproat is back in business, the
business of government. He returned to the Commons at the general
election as MP for Harwich, one of the lost generation of Scottish Tory
politicians who have had to rebuild their careers by finding English
seats, and was given a job by John Major in last month's reshuffle.
Sproat was a man on his way up the political ladder in his first job
as a junior minister at the Department of Trade when he failed to win
Roxburgh and Berwickshire at the 1983 general election. Ten years away
from the Commons is a big gap in anybody's political life and he is now
54. The present Home Secretary did not have a job in 1983 and the new
Chancellor was a junior minister at Health. Had Scotland not abandoned
the Conservatives quite so spectacularly he would by now, with luck,
have been in the Cabinet. Why has he returned to Westminster?
''I enjoyed it very much before,'' he said. ''I enjoyed being a
minister before. I felt there were things I wanted to make better -- and
I did not like being kicked out.''
It is early days yet, he is still reading himself into the job, and
this was his first interview. It took place in the brand new offices the
National Heritage department has acquired in Cockspur Street behind
Canada House, whose facade looks on to Trafalgar Square.
It is a handsome Victorian stone building concealing behind its
traditional facade a high tech pastel coloured palace with the
inevitable atrium with waterfall and an intrictate security system. The
latter is dictated partly by the fact that the two top floors of the
building house a commercial company, and partly by Peter Brook's old job
as Northern Ireland Secretary. The door codes and the plastic electronic
identity tags -- visitors are entered into the central computer records
on arrival -- may have their drawbacks, but the place is a vast
improvement on the back rooms of the Treasury building in Whitehall
where Arts and Libraries used to squat.
National Heritage, a new ministry, has acquired a wide remit which
stretches way beyond the Arts and Libraries to include tourism, the
media, broadcasting, the press and films, and sport. ''It is a very wide
brief and Peter Brook, the Secretary of State, believes we should both
know everything about everything,'' he said. ''A lot of our work is
representational and if you attend a function you have to know what it
is about.''
Although the Scottish Tourist Board does not come under the
department's control, National Heritage does, through the British
Tourist Authority, set the agenda for the whole country. ''I think that
tourism is the most underestimated industry in the United Kingdom,'' he
said. ''It has a turnover of #25 billion a year which represents 4% of
gross domestic product. The problem is how you define tourism.
''I have no idea to what extent, for instance, British Rail's turnover
is part of tourism. But clearly, even at the modest estimate of 4% of
GDP, I would be surprised if there were many industries which approached
that percentage, unless you took manufacturing as a whole.
''I think the importance of tourism has not been properly understood
because it is so diverse an industry. You can have a hotel chain the
size of Trust House Forte and a man with an ice cream cart on Clacton
pier and clearly both are in the same business. But the tourist industry
is so huge it is very difficult to pull together and that is something I
am determined to tackle.''
He said one of the problems was the fact that so many government
departments are responsible for different aspects of the industry. He
was responsible for tourism as whole, but regulations which affected
tourism could come from the Ministry of Agriculture, the Department of
the Environment, The Department of Trade and Industry.
For example, the regulations governing how theatres were lit were the
responsibility of the DTI and fire safety regulations were based on the
assumption that our theatres were gas lit, which was ''barmy''. That was
the kind of thing he was looking into. ''A lot of these regulations are
not necessarily bad,'' he said. ''The problem is that sometimes the
interpretation is inconsistent and over zealous.'' That was something he
would try to change.
On the future for the Arts, he said that this year the department was
spending #225.6m through the Arts Council, which was a lot of money.
''It would build and equip three brand new hospitals,'' he added. ''I do
think it is important that the spiritual health of the nation should be
considered, but that #225m is a serious consideration when you think
about those three hospitals and I am acutely conscious of that. I want
to see the arts in a better condition when I leave here, but the arts
community has to realise that important as the arts are there are other
important things. It cannot be immune from economic restraints which
everyone else has to bear.
''Since 1979 the Arts budget has gone up by 44% in real terms, which
is a lot of money. I am going to do my best for the arts, but I am not
going to be brow beaten into saying it must get more all the time when
others are getting less.''
He sees the role of business sponsorship, currently running at #60m a
year, as vital. In 1979 it was only #500,000. That was not to shuffle
out of the Government's responsibilities for the arts, because
sponsorship was additional money.
Ten years ago at Trade he was the films minister -- his predecessor at
Heritage, Robert Key, paid the traditional pre-moving jobs trip to the
Cannes Film festival last month -- and it looks as if he will be back
trying to help it again, although for the moment Peter Brook is leading
the talks with the industry. There did not seem, he said, to be much
point in coming in half way through, but it seemed that the same people
-- Richard Attenborough, David Putnam -- were saying the same things a
decade ago.
The industry's situation had been summed up by somebody as 'The
British film industry was alive and well -- and living in Hollywood'.
The problem was how to get it back here. The fact that 30% of the Oscars
in the last decade had been won by Britons showed we had the talent.
One task he intends to undertake is saving the Albert Memorial in Hyde
Park, but there is no money and funds must be found somewhere. He is,
although he would be the last man to say it, actually Mister Royal
Parks, and is toying with a flower show which would rival Chelsea using
the royal gardeners' expertise as a possible fund raiser. And when it
comes to monuments to famous men, he is also a devotee of Sir Walter
Scott, also a Melrose man, and is seeking ways to reinstate that most
eminent Victorian as one of our great cultural figures. All suggestions
are welcome.
Since the future of the ITV network falls under his department he is
looking into its structure. He has received, and given his parliamentary
past -- he was MP for Aberdeen South from 1970/83 -- understands
representations from Grampian about the risk of being swallowed up by
Scottish. The argument put to him was that the kind of news appropriate
for the audiences in the North East and the Highlands would not
necessarily be provided and was not the same as was wanted in Glasgow or
Edinburgh. ''I told Raymond Robertson of Grampian, who approached me
with his worries, that I would look at the matter very closely and I
will. That was not a brush off.'' Grampian is, of course, only one part
of the network, and he was using it as an illustration of what he will
be doing.
He admitted to missing representing a Scottish seat, but there was
some compensation from the fact that his new seat in Essex is full of
Scots. Round Harwich in the 1930s most of the farms appear to have been
acquired by Scots emigrants and there is as a result a large Scottish
community which still has strong links with home. Harwich even has a
pipe band, while Colchester has Highland Games.
As for his own roots, the only picture in his office that belongs to
him -- the rest came with the job and will be changed once he gets to
grips with the supplying department -- is of his ancestor, Major Dhilaes
Mac Bain who fought at Culloden, killed 13 English soldiers, and died of
his wounds in spite of the Duke of Cumberland insisting, when he was
captured, that he be spared. It is there, he said, just to show that
Scotland is never forgotten. And he has no intention of succumbing to
the English either.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article