A KILLER started a life sentence yesterday for murdering a teenage
girl, still showing no remorse, nor giving any clue as to what sparked
the frenzied attack.
Fraser Urquhart, 19, a factory worker, admitted the murder in Mintlaw,
near Peterhead. It was described by one of the North-east's most
experienced police officers as the most horrific he had ever seen.
After leaving a disco with Diane Grieve, 17, a trainee chef at the
Waterside Inn, Peterhead, Urquhart led her to the rear of Mintlaw
Academy, which was a shortcut to her home as well as a favourite
courting spot. He then beat her to death with his hands, a large tree
branch and her own shoe.
When her body was found, several letters were written in her own blood
on her thigh, but police could not decipher them. It was also clear she
had been sexually assaulted with a tree branch.
Aberdeen High Court heard yesterday that it seems certain she became
unconscious after the first blow, and did not suffer a prolonged ordeal.
Advocate-depute Mr Ian Peebles, QC, told the court that on the night
of the murder Miss Grieve, who lived in Old Deer, had gone out with a
number of friends. After visiting one disco, she ended up in another
called Traks.
While there she had an argument with her boyfriend, and was later seen
in the company of Urquhart. At about 1am the two left the disco
together.
''At various times they were said to be holding hands and walking arm
in arm by various witnesses,'' said Mr Peebles.
''About 1.20am Urquhart and Diane were seen walking towards the back
of Mintlaw Academy. It was the last time Diane was seen alive.''
The next morning about 8.35 her body was found at the rear of the
school.
''She had been beaten to such an extent she was unrecognisable. She
had to be identified by her dental records and GP records.''
Mr Peebles referred Lord Cullen to police photographs which ''vividly
illustrated the extent of the attack'' and said the injuries were so
severe that words could not properly describe them.
As well as being punched and kicked she had been beaten by the heel of
one of her shoes and beaten with a tree branch.
''It was a vicious attack,'' he said. ''The branch used had been torn
from a tree nearby. It was a vicious and prolonged attack on this young
girl. It is at least thought the young girl was probably unconscious
from the first blow onwards, and did not suffer overly from these
repeated blows.''
Mr Peebles told Lord Cullen he did not intend detailing the torso and
lower body injuries. It was sufficient to indicate that these covered 11
pages of the pathologist's report.
He concluded: ''The Crown knows nothing as to what led up to this
assault.''
Mr Ian Hamilton, QC, for the defence, offered no explanation either.
''No words of mine can mitigate the sentence which must be passed by
the court,'' he said.
Mr Hamilton wanted to draw attention to the fact that four
phychiatrists who had examined Urquhart had found him sane and fit to
plead, and there was no question of diminished responsibility at the
time of the attack, which was why he had taken the rare step of pleading
guilty to murder.
He also asked Lord Cullen to accept that Urquhart had confessed to the
crime during a long police interview, and had been convicted in terms of
his own confession.
Urquhart, a slight and short man, stood impassive in the dock as Lord
Cullen sentenced him to life in a Young Offenders Institution.
Afterwards, Superintendent Alex Den said dealing with the case had
been a harrowing experience. ''This was one of the most horrific murders
I have had to deal with.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article