The operator of Dounreay nuclear power plant in Caithness yesterday admitted illegally dumping radioactive waste and releasing nuclear fuel particles into the sea more than 40 years ago.
The UK Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) pleaded guilty to four charges under the Radioactive Substances Act 1960: one of disposing of radioactive waste at a landfill site at the plant between 1963 and 1975 and three of allowing nuclear fuel particles to be released into the Pentland Firth between 1963 and 1984.
The charges were brought after UKAEA was reported to the procurator-fiscal following a lengthy investigation by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa).
Wick Sheriff Court heard yesterday that fuel fragments which were supposed to be disposed of in a storage shaft had been put in 46,000 cubic metres of landfill. The error came to light in July 1999.
Alasdair MacDonald, procurator-fiscal for Caithness, Sutherland, and Easter Ross, said six radioactive particles were removed from the landfill and two from the coast.
He added that such solid radioactive waste could only have legally been disposed of in a low-level pit. Between December 1963 and December 1984, nuclear particles entered the sea from a drain.
The court heard was told that this drain was supposed to contain only liquid waste, but storage tanks were not properly filtered, allowing contaminated material to escape.
Mr MacDonald told the court that, between 1976 and the end of 2006, 1401 radioactive particles were recovered by UKAEA from the foreshore and nearby Sandside Beach.
He said Sepa had found between 1000 and 4000 particles within 15ft of an overflow pipe at Dounreay.
UKAEA also admitted allowing fragments to escape from two other pipes at the site.
Mr MacDonald said: "This appears to be a clear unauthorised disposal of solid radioactive waste as a matter of incompetence. It has not only lasting consequences for the future, but provides a clear signpost back to the mistakes of the past. Particles were literally flushed out to sea over a 20-year period."
Mr MacDonald said four nuclear fragments recovered from Dounreay's foreshore and two from the sea bed were considered "very dangerous" and could be fatal if ingested.
David Stewart, for UKAEA, said it was accepted that a small amount of radioactive material had been found in the landfill site and had been released into the sea. But a study had shown only an extremely small possibility of a member of the public coming into contact with a particle on local beaches.
Sheriff Andrew Berry deferred sentence until February 15.
Dr John Crofts, director of safety with UKAEA, said outside the court: "UKAEA deeply regrets that some particles were released from the site. The practices which gave rise to these particles ceased long ago."
A spokesman for Friends of the Earth Scotland said these incidents illustrate "the idiocy of considering an expansion of nuclear power in Scotland".
Dounreay, a former fast reactor research and development centre, was shut in 1994 and is earmarked for a £2.9bn decommissioning by 2033.
Last year UKAEA was fined £2m after 266 litres of hazardous, dissolved spent fuel spilled on to a laboratory floor at the plant.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article