An energy underclass could develop in Scotland if personal carbon trading is introduced in the fight against climate change, urban planning experts warned yesterday.
The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors in Scotland voiced concerns that low-income households could be driven into an eat-or-heat situation if tradable allowances were introduced.
UK Environment Secretary David Miliband signalled last year that the government was looking at the option of tradable personal carbon allowances as a way of curbing emissions.
People could then make money by selling surplus allowances.
However, the institution said: "The scheme could encourage vulnerable groups to compromise their energy use, and therefore their health and personal comfort, in order to sell-on surplus units to those who can afford to mitigate their energy use by buying extra allowance without making cuts."
The problem could be particularly acute in areas such as Glasgow, whose buildings have "some unique atmospheric and climatic issues leading to higher degrees of dampness penetration and condensation in buildings".
The Institute was launching a major report on measures needed to combat climate change over the next 40-50 years.
City Climate Challenge: your city, your responsibility compares current levels with UK targets to cut carbon emissions by 60% by 2050. The results give a dramatic insight into how our cities could look in the future.
Edinburgh would need 57,500 fewer cars on the road while Glasgow would need the equivalent of 1344 wind turbines, 35 Glendoe Hydro Schemes, nearly two nuclear power stations or 4.2 million solar panel roofs to meet the city's current demand.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article