THE Archbishop of Glasgow has warned that people morally opposed to legalising same-sex marriage would be in an "unlawful" position and could lose their jobs because of their views.
Mario Conti claimed there was a significant number of Scots who were opposed to the change in the law and who would continue to believe it was wrong even if MSPs passed new legislation.
Archbishop Conti’s comments, in a letter to The Herald, were made as Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon met the Bishop of Paisley, Philip Tartaglia, in Edinburgh yesterday to discuss the proposed legislation.
Archbishop Conti said: “We don’t know where the majority of Scots actually stand with regard to the Scottish Government’s mind to redefine marriage to include same-sex partnerships.
“What we do know is there is a hugely significant number of Scots who are not only opposed to this change for very sound reasons but who would, even after such a change, continue to hold that there cannot be a moral equivalence between the two forms of union.
“A change in the law will effectively render such people in a sense unlawful, vulnerable to accusations of discrimination, and in danger in some circumstances, of losing their jobs.”
Archbishop Conti’s letter follows comments by Perth and North Perthshire MP Pete Wishart at the weekend when he told a fringe meeting at the SNP conference that the controversial law change would happen, even though it is still only at its consultation stage.
After the meeting with Bishop Tartaglia, Ms Sturgeon said: “When I launched the consultation, I made clear that in addition to the written responses, we intended to meet a wide range of key organisations, including churches and faith groups.
“I also made clear that while Ministers tend towards the initial view that same-sex marriage should be introduced, that faith groups and their celebrants should not be obliged to solemnise same-sex marriages.”
Catholic church spokesman John Deighan said Bishop Tartaglia was “forthright in his assertion that proposals to legislate for same-sex marriage, would be harmful to society and to the Government”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article