THE SNP hailed victory in the Hillhead by-election as a step towards toppling Labour's control of Glasgow City Council for the first time in almost 40 years.
Party officials claimed an 11% increase in the SNP vote share and a swing of nearly 4% from Labour indicated the traditional Labour stronghold could be secured by the SNP in next May’s local elections.
The nationalists, who view control of the city council as vital to securing independence for Scotland, said the result showed Glaswegians are ready to vote for change.
However, their claims were rubbished by a Scottish Labour Party spokesman, who criticised the SNP’s “dreadful arrogance”.
Congratulating new Hillhead councillor Ken Andrew, SNP deputy leader Nicola Sturgeon promised the party would strive to take control of Glasgow City Council next year.
She wrote online: “A welcome sign last night that Glasgow wants change in the City Chambers. The SNP will be working hard to win the city’s trust in May.
“This result shows there is all to play for in Glasgow for next May’s elections as people across the city take the opportunity to vote to make Glasgow better.”
Her comments were echoed by Councillor Andrew, who also claimed the win was more than just a by-election victory.
He said: “I’m privileged to have been elected for Hillhead and I’m looking forward to getting straight to work.
“This result is more than simply a by-election win for the SNP. This is a sign of the determination of the people of Glasgow to grasp an opportunity for change in their city.
“It is a vote for the positive message of the SNP as Glasgow and Scotland move forward.”
Glasgow Kelvin SNP MSP Sandra White welcomed a first-preference swing from all parties to the SNP – including 4% from Labour, 10% from the Liberal Democrats and 5% from the Scottish Conservatives.
She said: “With swings to the SNP from all parties, this by-election shows we are continuing to win support across the board from people who want better governance for Glasgow.
“This is an excellent start to the SNP’s campaign for May’s elections and a chance for people in all parts of Glasgow to make the city better with a fresh start for the city council.”
However, Labour last night insisted the SNP’s hold on the seat by a majority of just 80 votes and a vote share increase of more than 5% showed Labour was still a threat.
A party spokesman said: “This is dreadful arrogance from the SNP who want to announce the result next year before a single vote has been cast. They might want to take people for granted, but Labour won’t.
“The election next year will be between a new, fresh team from Glasgow Labour under the leadership of Gordon Matheson, and an SNP team who are actually backing the Edinburgh Government’s unfair cut to the city’s budget. The fact this result was so close in a ward they thought they had in the bag shows that Glasgow’s new generation of Labour candidates has the SNP on the run.”
Labour MP Margaret Curran said: “Well done to all the campaign team who delivered such a close result, much closer than many pundits predicted, and came within 80 votes of making this a Labour gain.
“The turnout was very low so we are taking nothing for granted as we prepare for the local government elections next year, where we seek to persuade people of the positive case Labour has for how councils can change their lives.”
The by-election was held after the death of SNP councillor George Roberts, 68, who passed away in September.
Councillor Andrew won with 1026 votes, ahead of Labour candidate Martin McElroy with 945. The Scottish Green Party came third with 435 votes, followed by the Scottish Conservatives on 372 and the Liberal Democrats on 307.
There was a low turnout, of just 13.65%.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article