THE cash-rich SNP will resist the temptation to flaunt its new-found wealth by raising the limits for campaign spending in the referendum, The Herald understands.
The consultation document being laid out by Alex Salmond today is expected to say that the main campaign on each side should be limited to spending £750,000 – as set out in a consultation paper on a draft referendum Bill two years ago.
Political parties represented at Holyrood could spend a further £100,000 on their own, badged campaign. Any individual or group wishing to spend more than £3000 would have to register as a "permitted participant" and publish their identity.
There will be a similar section in today's consultation paper and the SNP's opponents were looking to cast a keen eye on it, given that the Nationalists have received two huge donations in recent months – one of almost £1 million from the estate of the late National Poet Edwin Morgan, and another for fully £1m from supporters Colin and Chris Weir, the Largs couple who won EuroMillions.
If today's paper had raised spending limits, opponents could have been expected to cry foul. However, The Herald understands the Government is not planning to go down that road and will suggest figures identical to those of two years ago, drawn up at a time when the SNP feared the No campaign, able to draw on backing from across the UK, might be able to swamp the Yes side financially.
The 2010 consultation also suggested there might be two questions in the referendum –the first a broad question about more powers for Holyrood, the second seeking full independence. This is likely to be echoed by the Government's latest consultation, which will stress that although an independence question is a given, consideration should be given to a "devo max" question.
The last consultation envisaged a franchise based on the same criteria as the right to vote in Holyrood elections and also mooted the idea of lowering the voting age to 16, something which will feature again today.
The same applies to the proposal that the body overseeing the referendum should be answerable to the Scottish Parliament rather than Westminster. A Scottish Referendum Commission was to be created but ministers have said the UK Electoral Commission could take on the role, provided that it is answerable to Holyrood.
An aide to the First Minister indicated that responses to the consultation will be considered from all over the UK and beyond, but that most weight would be given to those from eligible voters in Scotland.
Referring to both the running of the referendum, and the detail behind independence or greater devolution, he said the responses could touch on all of these issues.
"We want the best possible, fullest debate Scotland has had on this nation's constitutional future," the aide said.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereCommments are closed on this article