ALARM was expressed last night that taxpayers have footed a bill of almost £400,000 for 12 fig trees, which keep MPs in the shade beneath a glass-roofed atrium at Westminster.
The original five-year deal for the trees, imported from Florida, was said to cost £150,000, but freedom of information requests have revealed the true cost has been £32,500 a year for the decade or so the trees have been keeping MPs shaded as they eat and drink in the modern Portcullis House.
This means the trees have cost at least £370,000.
Labour's Thomas Docherty, the Fife MP on the Commons Administration Committee, which oversees parliamentary facilities, said he was "gobsmacked" by the true cost of the fig trees.
"This contract was signed in a time of plenty but now it is not a time of plenty so this should be looked at," he said. "I don't think MPs will be aware of this arrangement and I will be asking questions about it as soon as we get back from the recess. It's astonishing."
His fellow Labour MP Kevan Jones, who is also on the committee, noted: "For this money, you could have planted a small forest. Like a lot of things done in the Commons, they get very little scrutiny."
The Taxpayers' Alliance, which uncovered the figures, said: "This opulent greenery is a monument to the parliamentary authorities' profligacy."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article