BUSINESS passengers are prepared to pay significantly higher rail fares in return for improvements to services, a leading Scottish trade organisation said.
A survey carried out by the Scottish Council for Development and Industry found only one-quarter of passengers identified "minimising fare increases" as their main priority.
By contrast, the survey of 212 individuals and businesses around Scotland found reliability and punctuality was rated as the top priority by 69% or respondents. Service frequency, the ability to work on board a train and obtain a seat were all ranked higher than ticket prices.
The results, due to be submitted today as part of the Scottish Government's Rail 2014 consultation, will make for interesting reading among civil servants who have mooted the idea of raising statutory caps on rail fares. However, they were branded as "nonsense" and at odds with the views of ordinary passengers yesterday by the RMT rail union.
In the SCDI survey 67% of respondents agreed with the suggestion in the Rail 2014 consultation and said they were prepared to pay higher fares on routes where significant investment has been made.
James Alexander, senior policy and communications manager for SCDI, said: "What we've seen is broad business support for upgrades to services, not only including making services more reliable, frequent and faster but specifically including options to allow greater productivity on the train by, for example, providing wi-fi and a reliable phone signal.
"The crucial thing is the business community has said it is prepared to pay more for tickets if those facilities are available."
However, Bob Crow, general secretary of the Rail Maritime and Transport union, said: "This report is nonsense.
"The vast majority of people using Scottish rail services are not fat-cat business people on generous expenses, they are passengers on low to average earnings who would be hit hard by inflation-busting fare increases in the name of maximising private profits."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article