A DOG trained to look for bodies showed "some interest" in the boot of a car owned by a man accused of murder, a court has been told.
Jurors heard two cadaver police dogs were used to search the car of David Gilroy, the man accused of killing 38-year-old Suzanne Pilley.
A dog also found three areas of interest in the building where the missing bookkeeper worked, the court heard.
Gilroy, 49, denies murdering Ms Pilley on May 4, 2010, in Edinburgh, or elsewhere, hiding her body and driving with it in the boot of a car.
He also denies trying to cover up the alleged killing.
At the High Court in Edinburgh, Mark Heron, a senior scene examiner with the Scottish Police Services Authority, said a dog showed interest in the parking bays in the garage of Infrastructure Management, where Ms Pilley and Gilroy had worked.
However, defence QC Jack Davidson told the court no forensic link was found to connect items in the staircase, basement and the garage of the building to Gilroy.
Advocate depute Alex Prentice QC, prosecuting, showed the jury a computer-generated image of the office block in Thistle Street, Edinburgh, which Mr Heron said he first examined on May 9, 2010.
Mr Heron, 47, said one of the dogs "made its way around the garage sniffing" and paused at three areas. Jurors heard him describe two of the areas as being in parking bays and the other around a door.
The jury was then shown photos of Gilroy's silver car, impounded at a police garage. Mr Heron said he experienced a cleaning fluid or air freshener-type smell when he opened the boot. He then added: "The dog went into the boot and showed some interest."
Mr Davidson asked why the smell was not recorded by colleagues who examined the car days earlier. Mr Heron said: "I am 100% certain I could smell it."
Gilroy, of Edinburgh, denies all the charges against him. The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article