THE views of local people should hold greater sway over wind farm developments, the Prime Minister has suggested.
David Cameron indicated he believes that the reaction of communities close to such projects are not taken into account enough when decisions were taken.
It comes as villagers in the west coast of Scotland have angrily protested the prospect of housing the UK's tallest wind turbines.
Residents of the Firth Of Clyde have claimed that the new development could infringe their human rights.
North Ayrshire Council has given planning permission to SSE to build what is being described as Scotland's first offshore wind turbine testing site. Although it initially is planned to have a lifespan of just five years locals are concerned that it could eventually become permanent and have vowed to consider taking the entire project to court.
The Prime Minister is also facing a backbench rebellion from the right of his party over wind turbines.
Last month more than 100 of his own MPs wrote to the Conservative leader to protest and call for subsidies for onshore wind farms to be cut.
Mr Cameron told MPs during Prime Minister's Questions that his Conservative-Liberal Democrat Coalition was determined to give local people a "greater say" over issues like wind farms.
But he also backed the technology, saying that they had to be part of the mix of a future energy programme.
He has previously described his concerns about local input into sites as "particularly sensitive".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article