RANGERS administrators have not ruled out getting takeover bids from at least three more interested parties on top of the three already lodged.
It is hoped a Middle East consortium which has emerged as a new bidder may make a formal offer early this week.
But Duff & Phelps sources indicate that at least two other interested groups could still enter the fray.
And they say last Friday's deadline for prospective buyers of the club does not preclude anyone putting in an offer at the 11th hour, while they continue to resolve issues that it is feared might prevent sealing a deal.
Those still hovering include New York-based Fortress, described as an investment bank with current assets of £27 billion, which has expressed a definite interest.
Fortress Investment Group was set up as a private equity firm in 1998 by Wesley Edens, 51, and Robert Kauffman, 48, with Mr Edens said to have a personal fortune of £770 million.
Also still in the mix is a consortium from Singapore fronted by Glasgow-based businessman Shazad Bakhsh, who had been expected to make a formal bid last Friday.
Sale Sharks owner Brian Kennedy and the Blue Knights consortium led by former Rangers director Paul Murray both confirmed they had submitted takeover proposals on Friday, the loose deadline for first indicative bids set by administrators Duff and Phelps.
Chicago-based Club 9 Sports, who have seen investment offers for Sheffield Wednesday and Tranmere rejected, were also understood to have lodged a bid.
Duff and Phelps will continue today to seek a resolution at the Court of Session of the status of the Ticketus deal involving the sale of the rights to four years of season tickets for more than £20m to finance Craig Whyte's takeover of the club.
They believe it is an obstacle to finalising a sale, and want to break the deal so that the tickets are invalidated and Ticketus becomes an unsecured creditor alongside HMRC.
Rangers administrator Paul Clark said over the weekend: "There are parties that are keeping themselves to themselves and getting on with it."
Mr Clark added: "A new party appeared overnight on Thursday and they are speeding themselves along over the weekend and they expect to make a bid early next week.
"They're not people I have dealt with before. They appear to be a credible party and we'll see what their work over the weekend brings."
Duff & Phelps admitted on Friday offers were only indicative or conditional as all parties were looking for more clarity on complex issues.
These include the club's unresolved big tax dispute, a legal case with investment firm Ticketus over a season ticket deal, which resumes tomorrow in the Court of Session in Edinburgh, and the status of majority shareholder Craig Whyte.
Whyte bought an 85% stake in Rangers for £1 on the basis he would invest in the club, but administrators claim there is no evidence he put any money in.
"We've had ongoing discussions with Craig and, in fact, I met him earlier this week just to try to finalise some of these issues," Mr Clark said.
"I remain confident that Craig Whyte's position will not be an impediment to a sale."
Meanwhile, a judge has retrospectively appointed two insolvency experts as administrators at crisis-hit Rangers to correct an earlier flaw in the process.
Paul Clark and David Whitehouse of Duff and Phelps were originally brought in as joint administrators last month following financial problems at Ibrox.
But it was later discovered that it was invalid because the directors at Rangers did not obtain Financial Services Authority consent for the appointment as required.
Rangers returned to the Court of Session in Edinburgh to have the men made interim managers ahead of proceedings to rectify the position.
After a hearing today Lord Hodge said: "I will make an administration order in respect of Rangers Football Club plc being effective from 2.45 pm on February 14 and appoint Mr Clark and Mr Whitehouse to be joint administrators of the company."
The judge said he noted that no application was made for the expenses of the petition to have the administrators appointed retrospectively.
David Sellar QC, for Rangers, said: "The interests of the creditors would not be served by the confusion of potentially invalidating the steps that have already been taken in the purported process."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article