A SHAKE-UP of university admissions, which would have led to a radical change in Scottish school exams, has been rejected.
Last year, the university admissions service Ucas suggested bringing applications across the UK into line, which would have led to a much earlier exam diet in Scotland.
The idea behind the change was to ensure students in England were able to apply to their chosen university based on their actual grades, rather than getting conditional offers on predicted grades.
However, universities and school bodies in Scotland opposed the changes, arguing that it would put Scottish applicants at a "considerable disadvantage" to those elsewhere in the UK by shortening preparation time for exams.
Simon Jennings, deputy director of Universities Scotland, which represents university principals, welcomed the Ucas move.
"Universities Scotland was supportive of the principle of post-qualification applications, but had a number of practical concerns," he said.
"We are pleased that Ucas has listened to those concerns."
However, Robin Parker, NUS Scotland president, said moving the admissions process could have had advantages for students from poorer backgrounds.
"It would have allowed universities to judge prospective students on their real grades, rather than predicted grades, which can be inaccurate for people at schools that aren't used to sending their pupils on to universities."
The decision came as the latest figures on university entry from Ucas confirmed a fall in numbers of students from the rest of the UK applying to Scotland. There has been a 5.6% fall in student applications from England and a 15% decline from Northern Ireland.
The decline follows the decision by the Scottish Government to allow universities north of the Border to introduce fees of up to £9000 for students from the rest of the UK.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article