Labour has claimed the Government is planning a "second granny tax" as the party pledged to force votes against specific budget measures in the Commons.
It said scrapping savings credit would cost 105,000 new pensioners up to £897 per year. The credit is due to be abolished as part of Government reforms to create single tier, flat state pension.
The Department for Work and Pensions said no-one would lose money because savings credit is means tested and the single tier pension moves all pensioners above the means test level. However, the Opposition said figures from the House of Commons library backed its analysis.
Labour is expected to force Commons votes on several budget measures when Parliament returns from the Easter recess this week.
Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary Liam Byrne said: "George Osborne has been caught bang to rights plotting another secret raid on hard-pressed pensioners.
"First, we had the Granny Tax. Now we've uncovered Granny Tax Mark 2 – a £900 cut for pensioners who did the right thing and saved some money for retirement. Pensioners will be dis-gusted at this secret attempt to pick their pockets to pay for tax-breaks for millionaires.
"This Government is hell-bent on attacking the right-thinking values of hard-working people."
Mr Byrne said losses would be maximised on pensioners who are eligible for savings credit only –which he said was 3% of people aged 65-69, or 104,770 of the current group.
He said the House of Commons library had confirmed this means a cash loss of £17.25 a week per pensioner – adding up to £897 per year.
However, a Department for Work and Pensions spokeswoman said: "No-one currently getting savings credit will lose it under a single tier system."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article