FILMING criminal courts allows justice to be seen to be done and will be extended, but Scotland is still a world away from the US-style show trial "soap operas", according to one expert.
The landmark televising of the Gilroy sentencing was approved by Lord Hamilton, Scotland's most senior judge, after an application by STV, which had been pressing for greater access to courtrooms – a change also being considered south of the Border.
But, unlike in American courts, the camera focused yesterday on Lord Bracadale as he gave his sentence and no-one else featured in the footage except the macer and the clerk.
Gilroy was not filmed and the footage was released after a brief check during which any noise from the court could be edited.
Professor Peter Duff, who specialises in criminal justice, evidence and procedure at Aberdeen University law school, said he believed it was a positive move.
He said: "The benefit of showing the sentence is clear. The courts are anxious to open up and allow people to see the process of accountability. The idea is by wider opening up of the courts it would give the public more confidence in the system."
But the prospect has sparked concern among some legal experts, who have warned that the presence of cameras could "pollute and corrupt" the process of justice.
Mr Duff said: "It is almost certain that this is not Scotland heading towards the OJ Simpson-style show trial soap operas. There would be difficulties (in US-style filming) for numerous reasons, including anonymity.
"The permission that was given this time was very strict and the accused could not be shown."
While the Gilroy sentencing was the first criminal case to be televised in the UK, appeal cases have been filmed.
A production company wants to film a documentary of proceedings in the case involving Nat Fraser, 53, who is charged with the murder of Arlene Fraser, of Elgin, Moray, in 1998 and is due to stand trial later this month.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article